Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Argumentation through languages and cultures / / edited by Christian Plantin



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Titolo: Argumentation through languages and cultures / / edited by Christian Plantin Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Cham, Switzerland : , : Springer, , [2022]
©2022
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (208 pages)
Disciplina: 929
Soggetto topico: Cross-cultural studies
Persona (resp. second.): PlantinChristian
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references.
Nota di contenuto: Intro -- Contents -- Argumentation Through Languages and Cultures -- Abstract -- References -- Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems in the Spring and Autumn Period of Ancient China -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Generalized Argumentation Theory -- 2.1 Generalized argumentation -- 2.2 The Basic Structure of Generalized Argumentation -- 2.3 Methodology for Generalized Argumentation: Localized Procedure -- 3 Cultural Background of Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems -- 3.1 The Cultural Principle of Li (礼)3 -- 3.2 Power Struggle and Li -- 3.3 The Important Roles of Poems in the Spring and Autumn Period and Reciting Poems -- 4 A Case Study of the Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems -- 4.1 A Case of Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems -- 4.2 Round One -- 4.3 Round Two -- 4.4 Round Three -- 4.5 The Reasonableness of the Rules of Political Argumentation by Reciting Poems -- 4.6 Test of Rules -- 4.7 Little Red Book Quotation Fight: A Similar Phenomenon -- 5 Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- References -- Jain Philosophers in the Debating Hall of Classical India -- Abstract -- 1 Introductive Remarks -- 1.1 The Place of Argumentation in India -- 1.2 The Rules of Rational Debate -- 1.3 Jainism and Argumentation -- 2 Argumentation in Early Jain Canonical Literature -- 2.1 Magical Powers in the Debating Hall -- 2.2 Considerations on Convincing Reasoning in the Canon -- 3 Systematic Considerations on Argumentation -- 3.1 The Constituents of Inference -- 3.2 The Grounds of Inference -- 3.3 The Types of Inference -- 4 Other Types of Sophistication in Rational Debates -- References -- Attack, Defense and Counter-Attack in the Inuit Duel Songs of Ammassalik -- Abstract -- 1 Duel Songs in the Ammassalik Culture -- 1.1 The Scenario -- 1.1.1 A Conflictual Event -- 1.1.2 Appellant and Defendant.
1.1.3 Summoning the Offender to the Duel and Waiting for Him -- 1.1.4 The Duel -- 1.1.5 The Sanction of the Audience -- 1.2 Specificities and Functions of the Song Duel -- 1.2.1 Ordeal, Verbal Duel and Song Duel -- 1.2.2 Functions of the Duel Songs -- 2 An Argumentative Reading of the Ammassalik Songs -- 2.1 Verbal Duel as an Argumentative Genre -- 2.2 Contradiction, Issue -- 3 Laying the Charge -- 4 Dealing with the Charge -- 4.1 Dismissing the Appellant -- 4.2 Dismissing the Charge: "I Didn't Do It!" -- 4.3 The Controversial Action is Acknowledged and Justified -- 4.4 Acknowledging and Re-interpreting the Facts -- 4.5 Counter-Accusing -- 4.5.1 The Counter-Accusation Relates to the Same Field -- 4.5.2 The Counter-Accusation Reverses the Charge -- 5 Conclusions: Results and Limitations -- 5.1 A Classification of the Respondent's Defense Strategies -- 5.2 Limitations Coming from the Data Considered -- 5.3 A Performance -- Acknowledgements -- References -- Arsyad Al-Banjari's Dialectical Model for Integrating Indonesian Traditional Uses into Islamic Law -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Basics on Qiyās -- 3 Arsyad Al-Banjari's Jadal: Two Dialogues on Integration7 -- 3.1 Qiyās al-Shabah on Manyanggar and Mambuang Pasilih -- 3.1.1 Brief Remarks on the Cultural and Philosophical Background -- 3.1.2 An Overall View of the Argument -- 3.1.3 The Dialogue on Manyanggar and Mambuang Pasilih -- 3.1.4 Elements for a Dialectical Analysis of the Argument -- 3.2 Al-Banjari's Jadal for a qiyās al-'illa on Lahang -- 3.2.1 An Overall View of the Argument -- 3.2.2 Dialogue on Fermented Lahang -- 3.2.3 Elements for a Dialectical Analysis of the Argument -- 4 Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- References -- Annotating Argument Schemes -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Argument Scheme Corpora -- 2.1 Conceptions of Argument Schemes.
2.2 Existing Argument Scheme Annotations -- 2.3 Argument Scheme Annotation Task -- 2.3.1 Source Data -- 2.3.2 The US2016 Corpus -- 2.3.3 Annotation Procedure -- 3 Annotation Guidelines for Argument Schemes -- 3.1 Annotation with Douglas Walton's Taxonomy -- 3.1.1 Taxonomy of Argumentation Schemes -- 3.1.2 Annotation Guidelines for Walton's Taxonomy -- 3.2 Annotation with Jean Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments -- 3.2.1 Periodic Table of Arguments -- 3.2.2 Annotation Guidelines for Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments -- 4 Annotation Results -- 4.1 Results of Annotation with Walton's Taxonomy -- 4.2 Results of Annotation with the Periodic Table of Arguments -- 4.3 Comparison of Results -- 5 Evaluation and Revision of Annotation Methods -- 5.1 Discussion of Guidelines for Walton's Taxonomy -- 5.2 Discussion of Guidelines for Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments -- 6 Applications of Annotated Argument Scheme Corpora -- 6.1 Argument Mining -- 6.2 Rhetorical Profiling -- 7 Conclusion -- Acknowledgements -- References -- Reconstructing Multimodal Arguments in Advertisements: Combining Pragmatics and Argumentation Theory -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Theoretical Background -- 2.1 Text and Text Genre -- 2.2 Argumentation-From a Strictly Linguistic Approach to a Broad Text Genre Perspective -- 2.3 A Multimodal Text Approach -- 3 Methodology -- 3.1 Explicatures: Disambiguation, Specification, Enrichment -- 3.2 Polyphonic Structure -- 3.3 Presuppositions and Polyphony -- 3.4 Purpose of the Utterance and What is Meant-Higher-Order Explicatures -- 3.5 Reconstruction of Further Argumentative Inferences -- 4 Applying the Analytical Framework -- 4.1 Analysis of the Context and the Semantic representation of the Message -- 4.2 Explicatures: Polyphony -- 4.3 Explicatures: Specifications -- 4.4 Higher Order Explicatures -- 4.5 Further Argumentative Inferences.
5 Conclusion -- Acknowledgments -- References -- The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory -- Abstract -- 1 Introduction -- 2 Methodology -- 2.1 Argumentative Functions -- 2.2 Types of Metaphor -- 3 Approaches to Metaphor in Argumentation Theory -- 3.1 The Linguistic Dimension of Metaphor -- 3.2 The Conceptual Dimension of Metaphor -- 3.3 The Communicative Dimension of Metaphor -- 4 Function of Metaphor in Argumentative Discourse -- 4.1 Argumentative Functions of Metaphor -- 4.2 Metaphor as Standpoint -- 4.3 Metaphors as Starting Points -- 4.4 Metaphor as Argument -- 4.4.1 Metaphor as Figurative Analogy Argument -- 4.4.2 Metaphors as Other Types of Argument -- 4.4.3 Metaphors as Rebuttal Analogies -- 5 Overview of Functions and Dimensions of Metaphor -- 6 Conclusion and Discussion -- Acknowledgements -- References.
Titolo autorizzato: Argumentation through languages and cultures  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 9783031193217
9783031193200
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910631087703321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui