Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Attacking Judges : How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections / / Melinda Gann Hall



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Hall Melinda Gann Visualizza persona
Titolo: Attacking Judges : How Campaign Advertising Influences State Supreme Court Elections / / Melinda Gann Hall Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Stanford, CA : , : Stanford University Press, , [2020]
©2014
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (264 p.)
Disciplina: 324.973
Soggetto topico: Advertising, Political -- Law and legislation -- United States
Courts of last resort -- United States -- States
Judges -- United States -- Election
Political questions and judicial power -- United States -- States
Judges - Election - United States
Advertising, Political - Law and legislation - United States
Courts of last resort - States - United States
Political questions and judicial power - States - United States
Soggetto genere / forma: Electronic books.
Note generali: Description based upon print version of record.
Nota di contenuto: Front matter -- Contents -- Tables and Figures -- Preface and Acknowledgments -- 1. Attacking Judges -- 2. State Supreme Court Elections in Contemporary Democracy -- 3. Campaign Advertising in State Supreme Court Elections -- 4. Attack Advertising and Electoral Support for State Supreme Court Justices -- 5. Attack Advertising and Citizen Participation in State Supreme Court Elections -- 6. State Supreme Court Elections Are Different—by Design -- Notes -- References -- Index
Sommario/riassunto: Nasty, below-the-belt campaigns, mudslinging, and character attacks. These tactics have become part and parcel of today's election politics in America, and judicial elections are no exception. Attacking Judges takes a close look at the effects of televised advertising, including harsh attacks, on state supreme court elections. Author Melinda Gann Hall investigates whether these divisive elections have damaging consequences for representative democracy. To do this, Hall focuses on two key aspects of those elections: the vote shares of justices seeking reelection and the propensity of state electorates to vote. In doing so, Attacking Judges explores vital dimensions of the conventional wisdom that campaign politics has deleterious consequences for judges, voters, and state judiciaries. Countering the prevailing wisdom with empirically based conclusions, Hall uncovers surprising and important insights, including new revelations on how attack ads influence public engagement with judicial elections and their relative effectiveness in various types of state elections. Attacking Judges is a testament to the power of institutions in American politics and the value of empirical political science research in helping to inform some of the most significant debates on the public agenda. This book's results smartly contest and eradicate many of the fears judicial reformers have about the damaging effects of campaign negativity in modern state supreme court elections.
Titolo autorizzato: Attacking Judges  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 0-8047-9309-3
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910460248303321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilitĂ  qui
Serie: Stanford Studies in Law and Politics