Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial : Congressional Lawsuits and the Separation of Powers / / Jasmine Farrier



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Farrier Jasmine Visualizza persona
Titolo: Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial : Congressional Lawsuits and the Separation of Powers / / Jasmine Farrier Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Ithaca, NY : , : Cornell University Press, , [2019]
©2019
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (199 pages)
Disciplina: 342.73/044
Soggetto topico: Political questions and judicial power - United States
Executive-legislative relations - United States
Judicial power - United States - Cases
Legislative power - United States - Cases
Executive power - United States - Cases
Separation of powers - United States - Cases
Soggetto non controllato: constitution, congress, president, court, war powers
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references and index.
Nota di contenuto: Front matter -- Contents -- Introduction: Systemic Constitutional Dysfunction -- 1. War Is Justiciable, Until It Isn't -- 2. Suing to Save the War Powers Resolution -- 3. Legislative Processes Are Constitutional Questions -- 4. Courts Cannot Unknot Congress -- 5. Silence Is Consent for the Modern Presidency -- 6. So Sue Him -- Conclusion: Lawful but Awful -- Acknowledgments -- Notes -- References -- Index
Sommario/riassunto: In an original assessment of all three branches, Jasmine Farrier reveals a new way in which the American federal system is broken. Turning away from the partisan narratives of everyday politics, Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial diagnoses the deeper and bipartisan nature of imbalance of power that undermines public deliberation and accountability, especially on war powers. By focusing on the lawsuits brought by Congressional members that challenge presidential unilateralism, Farrier provides a new diagnostic lens on the permanent institutional problems that have undermined the separation of powers system in the last five decades, across a diverse array of partisan and policy landscapes. As each chapter demonstrates, member lawsuits are an outlet for frustrated members of both parties who cannot get their House and Senate colleagues to confront overweening presidential action through normal legislative processes. But these lawsuits often backfire - leaving Congress as an institution even more disadvantaged. Jasmine Farrier argues these suits are more symptoms of constitutional dysfunction than the cure. Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial shows federal judges will not and cannot restore the separation of powers system alone. Fifty years of congressional atrophy cannot be reversed in court.
Titolo autorizzato: Constitutional Dysfunction on Trial  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 1-5017-4446-1
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910821686603321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui