Vai al contenuto principale della pagina

Arguing about climate change [[electronic resource] ] : judging the handling of climate risk to future generations by comparison to the general standards of conduct in the case of risk to contemporaries / / Marc David Davidson



(Visualizza in formato marc)    (Visualizza in BIBFRAME)

Autore: Davidson Marc David Visualizza persona
Titolo: Arguing about climate change [[electronic resource] ] : judging the handling of climate risk to future generations by comparison to the general standards of conduct in the case of risk to contemporaries / / Marc David Davidson Visualizza cluster
Pubblicazione: Amsterdam, : Amsterdam University Press, c2008
Descrizione fisica: 1 online resource (148 p.)
Disciplina: 350
363.738/74
Soggetto topico: Environmental ethics
Climatic changes - Moral and ethical aspects
Environmental responsibility
Note generali: The work was "financed by the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) in the context of the programme Ethics, Research & Public Policy, and the Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment (VROM)."
Originally presented as the author's Ph.D Thesis from the University of Amsterdam.
Nota di bibliografia: Includes bibliographical references.
Nota di contenuto: Contents; General introduction; Chapter 1: An inconvenient truth; Chapter 2: Climate damage as wrongful harm to future generations; Chapter 3: Regulation of climate change and the reasonable man standard; Chapter 4: A social discount rate for climate damage to future generations based on regulatory law; Chapter 5: How reasonable man discounts climate damage; Chapter 6: Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol; Summary; Nederlandse samenvatting; Acknowledgements; Curriculum vitae
Sommario/riassunto: Intergenerational justice requires that climate risks to future generations be handled with the same reasonable care deemed acceptable by society in the case of risks to contemporaries. Such general standards of conduct are laid down in tort law, for example. Consequently, the validity of arguments for or against more stringent climate policy can be judged by comparison to the general standards of conduct applying in the case of risk to contemporaries. That this consistency test is able to disqualify certain arguments in the climate debate is illustrated by a further investigation of the debat
Titolo autorizzato: Arguing about climate change  Visualizza cluster
ISBN: 1-282-45384-X
9786612453847
90-485-0834-7
Formato: Materiale a stampa
Livello bibliografico Monografia
Lingua di pubblicazione: Inglese
Record Nr.: 9910780924503321
Lo trovi qui: Univ. Federico II
Opac: Controlla la disponibilità qui