{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[31,2,31,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996492066603316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Slavery and Other Forms of Strong Asymmetrical Dependencies : Semantics and Lexical Fields / / ed. by Jeannine Bischoff, Stephan Conermann"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Berlin ; ; Boston : , : De Gruyter, , [2022]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2022"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-11-078698-2"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (V, 257 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Dependency and Slavery Studies , , 2701-1127 ; ; 1"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"417.7"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"HISTORY / Medieval"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Contents -- Introduction: The Semantics of Slavery and Other Forms of Strong Asymmetrical Dependency in Comparison -- Indefinite Terms? Social Groups in Early Ancient China (ca. 1300–771 BC) and “Strong Asymmetrical Dependency” -- Tax Coercion as a Real and Metaphorical YOKE: On the Earliest State Administrative Practices Reflected in Ancient Egyptian Writing and Images Around 3000 BC -- Dependent Rural Populations in Archaic and Classical Greece: Free, Slave, or Between Free and Slave? -- Familia and Dependency in Roman Law Texts -- Visualizations and Expressions of Dependencies in Classic Maya Narratives: A Semiotic Approach -- How to Approach Emic Semantics of Dependency in Islamic Legal Texts: Reflections on the Ḥanafī Legal Commentary al-Hidāya fī sharḥ bidāya al-mubtadī and its British-Colonial Translation -- Modes of Manumission: What Terms Used for Emancipation Tell Us about Dependencies in Ottoman Society -- Terms for Dependent People in Rural Russia in Early Modern Records -- Contributors -- Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In this volume, we approach the phenomenon of slavery and other types of strong asymmetrical dependencies from two methodologically and theoretically distinct perspectives: semantics and lexical fields. Detailed analyses of key terms that are associated with the conceptualization of strong asymmetrical dependencies promise to provide new insights into the self-concept and knowledge of pre-modern societies. The majority of these key terms have not been studied from a semantic or terminological perspective so far. Our "]
[{"$nulls":4},"understanding of lexical fields is based on an onomasiological approach – which linguistic items are used to refer to a concept? Which words are used to express a concept? This means that the concept is a semantic unit which is not directly accessible but may be manifested in different ways on the linguistic level. We are interested in single concepts such as ‘wisdom’ or ‘fear’, but also in more complex semantic units like ‘strong asymmetrical dependencies’. In our volume, we bring together and compare case studies from very different social orders and normative perspectives. Our examples range from Ancient China and Egypt over Greek and Maya societies to Early Modern Russia, the Ottoman Empire and Islamic and Roman law."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910968287503321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Challenging clitics / / edited by Christine Meklenborg Salvesen, Hans Petter Helland"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia, : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2013"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9789027271945"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9027271941"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (323 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, , 0166-0829 ; ; v. 206"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"415/.92"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Grammar, Comparative and general - Clitics"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Challenging Clitics; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of Contents; Acknowledgements; Acknowledgements; Why challenging clitics?; Some introductory remarks; Christine Meklenborg Salvesen & Hans Petter Helland; Why challenging clitics?; 1. Introduction; 2. Clitics as a linguistic object; 2.1 Words, clitics and affixes; 2.2 Simple clitics and special clitics; 2.3 The position of clitics; 2.4 Thematic arguments or functional heads?; 2.4.1 Clitics as D0s; 2.4.2 Clitics as functional heads; 2.5 Clitics and phases; 3. The subject cycle; 3.1 The subject pronoun in French"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4. The interest of this volume 4.1 The derivation of clitic structures; 4.2 Finiteness and phases; 4.3 Clitics in LFG; 4.4 Clitics in Distributed Morphology; 4.5 Slavic clitics and the TP projection; 4.6 Interrogative clitics; 4.7 Clitics or affixes?; 4.8 The acquisition of clitics; 4.9 Clitic clusters; 5. Conclusion; References; Enclisis at the syntax-PF interface; Marios Mavrogiorgos; Enclisis at the syntax-PF interface; 1. The proclisis-enclisis alternation; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Proclisis and enclisis in finiteness sensitive and Tobler-Mussafia languages; 1.2.1 Overview of the data"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1.2.2 Past analyses 2. V-movement analysis as a purely PF or syntactic account; 2.1 Against a pure PF account; 2.2 Against a pure syntactic account; 2.3 V-movement across the cliticization site: What is syntax and what is PF?; 3. V-movement to a V-related head: The role of PF; 3.1 The finiteness factor in finiteness sensitive languages; 3.2 Non-finite enclisis in Tobler-Mussafia languages; 3.3 Finite enclisis in Tobler-Mussafia languages; 4. Summary and conclusions; References; Clisis revisited; Root and embedded contexts in Western Iberian*; Francisco "]
[{"$nulls":4},"José Fernández-Rubiera; Clisis revisited"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1. Enclisis and proclisis in Western Iberian Romance languages 1.1 Enclisis and proclisis in the matrix context in Western Iberian Romance languages; 1.2 Enclisis and proclisis in the finite embedded context in Asturian; 2. Previous approaches to enclisis and proclisis alternations; 2.1 Phonological approaches to enclisis and proclisis alternations; 2.2 Syntactic approaches to enclisis and proclisis alternations; 3. The nature of clitics in Western Iberian Romance languages and the role of Finitenesso in deriving enclisis/proclisis alternations"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4. The edge-condition of Fino and its role in deriving enclisis/proclisis alternations in the matrix environment in Western Iberian Romance languages 4.1 Enclisis and the edge-condition of Fino; 4.2 Proclisis and the edge-condition of Fino; 4.3 The edge-condition of Fino and enclisis/proclisis alternations: A summary; 5. The edge-condition of Fino, the complementizer system and clitic placement alternations (or lack thereof) in the finite embedded context in Western Iberian; 5.1 Demonte and Fernández Soriano (2009): The que1 \"that1\" and the que2 \"that2\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"5.2 Assertive predicates, selection, complementizers and enclisis/proclisis alternations in Asturian"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In Old French, all clitic clusters containing objects observed the order ACC-DAT. During the 15th and 16th centuries this order was changed into DAT-ACC in cases where objects of the 1st and 2nd person were involved. This change took place rather abruptly. In this paper I will argue that increased use of reflexive forms provoked a change in the order in these clitic clusters. More specifically, I will argue that clusters involving 1st and 2nd person argumental clitics form true clusters in Modern French (in the sense of Pescarini (2012)), whereas they formed split clusters in the old language."]