{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[16,2,16,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996465844203316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Theoretical and practical aspects of SPIN model checking : 5th and 6th International SPIN Workshops, Trento, Italy, July 5, 1999, Toulouse, France, September 21 and 24, 1999, proceedings / / edited by Dennis Dams [and three others]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Berlin, Germany ; ; New York, New York : , : Springer, , [1999]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Â©1999"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-540-48234-2"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 1999.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (X, 282 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Lecture notes in computer science ; ; Volume 1680"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"005.276"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"SPIN (Computer file)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Computer software - Verification"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"I:Selection of Papers Presented at 5thSPIN99 -- Integrated Formal Verification: Using Model Checking with Automated Abstraction, Invariant Generation, and Theorem Proving -- Runtime Efficient State Compaction in Spin -- Distributed-Memory Model Checking with SPIN -- Partial Order Reduction in Presence of Rendez-vous Communications with Unless Constructs and Weak Fairness -- Divide, Abstract, and Model-Check -- II: Papers Presented at 6thSPIN99 -- Formal Methods Adoption: What’s Working, What’s Not! -- Model Checking for Managers -- Xspin/Project - Integrated Validation Management for Xspin -- Analyzing Mode Confusion via Model Checking -- Detecting Feature Interactions in the Terrestrial Trunked Radio (TETRA) Network Using Promela and Xspin -- Java PathFinder A Translator from Java to Promela -- VIP: A Visual Interface for Promela -- Events in Property Patterns -- Assume-Guarantee Model Checking of Software: A Comparative Case Study -- A Framework for Automatic Construction of Abstract Promela Models -- Model Checking Operator Procedures -- Applying Model Checking in Java Verification -- The Engineering of a Model Checker: the Gnu i-Protocol Case Study Revisited. -- Embedding a Dialect of SDL in PROMELA -- dSPIN: A Dynamic Extension of SPIN."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Increasing the designer’s con dence that a piece of software or hardwareis c- pliant with its speci cation has become a key objective in "]
[{"$nulls":4},"the design process for software and hardware systems. Many approaches to reaching this goal have been developed, including rigorous speci cation, formal veri cation, automated validation, and testing. Finite-state model checking, as it is supported by the explicit-state model checkerSPIN,is enjoying a constantly increasingpopularity in automated property validation of concurrent, message based systems. SPIN has been in large parts implemented and is being maintained by Gerard Ho- mann, and is freely available via ftp fromnetlib.bell-labs.comor from URL http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/cs/what/spin/Man/README.html. The beauty of nite-state model checking lies in the possibility of building \\push-button\" validation tools. When the state space is nite, the state-space traversal will eventually terminate with a de nite verdict on the property that is being validated. Equally helpful is the fact that in case the property is inv- idated the model checker will return a counterexample, a feature that greatly facilitates fault identi cation. On the downside, the time it takes to obtain a verdict may be very long if the state space is large and the type of properties that can be validated is restricted to a logic of rather limited expressiveness."]