{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":54,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":54,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[15,2,15,3],[15,4,15,5],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3],[20,2,20,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[33,2,33,3],[33,4,33,5],[34,2,34,3],[34,4,34,5],[35,2,35,3],[35,4,35,5],[36,2,36,3],[37,2,37,3],[39,2,39,3],[40,2,40,3],[41,2,41,3],[42,2,42,3],[43,2,43,3],[46,2,46,3],[47,2,47,3],[51,2,51,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996384553103316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Markham Gervase <1568?-1637.>"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The perfect horseman, or, The experienced secrets of Mr. Markham's fifty years practice [[electronic resource] ] : shewing how a man may come to be a general horseman, by the knowledge of these seven offices, viz. the breeder, feeder, ambler, rider, keeper, buyer, farrier / / and now published by Lancelot Thetford, practitioner in the same art for the space of forty years"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London, : Printed for Humphrey Moseley ..., 1656"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[The second edition.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"[15], 175 p., 1 leaf of plates"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Horses"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Horses - Diseases"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Horsemanship"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Added t.p. engraved."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reproduction of original in Huntington Library."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","eebo-0113"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996396837203316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Hammond Henry <1605-1660.>"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"A vindication of Dr. Hammonds addresse, &c. from the exceptions of Eutactus Philodemius [[electronic resource] ] : in two particulars. Concerning the power supposed in the Jew, over his owne freedome. The no-power over a mans own life. Together with a briefe reply to Mr Iohn Goodwins Hubrisodikai, as far as concernes Dr. Hammond"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London, : Printed for R. Royston, at the Angel in Ivie-lane, 1649"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"[2], 44, [2] p"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Life and death, Power over - Religious aspects - Christianity"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Jewish law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Power (Christian theology)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","By Henry Hammond, in support of his: To the Right Honourable, the Lord Fairfax, and his Councell of Warre."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Eutactus Philodemius = Antony Ascham. In part a reply to his: Genesis kai telos exousias."]
[{"$nulls":4},"The words \"the power .. own life.\" are bracketed together on title page; \"Hybristodikai\" is in Greek characters."]
[{"$nulls":4},"The final leaf is blank."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Annotation on Thomason copy: \"July 2d\"."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reproduction of the original in the British Library."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","eebo-0018"]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910957549403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Myers Ramon Hawley <1929->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The struggle across the Taiwan strait : the divided China problem / / Ramon H. Myers and Jialin Zhang"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Stanford, Calif., : Hoover Institution Press, Stanford University, c2006"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9780817946937"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0817946934"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (181 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Hoover Institution Press publication ; ; no. 542"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"327.5105124/909"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Chinese reunification question, 1949-"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Taiwan Relations China"]
[{"$nulls":4},"China Relations Taiwan"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Front Cover; Book Title; Copyright; Contents; Introduction; 1.  China Divides into Two Rival Regimes; 2.  The Move toward Détente; 3.  Détente and Its Collapse; 4.  The Challenge of Taiwan Independence; 5.  Taiwan's Economic Slowdown andGrowing Integration with Mainland China; 6.  The Watershed Elections of 2004 and Aftermath; 7.  Conclusion: Divided China's Continuing Struggle; Appendix:  Key Documents; 1.  The Joint U.S.-China Communiqué,Shanghai, February 27, 1972; 2.  Joint Communiqué on Establishment ofU.S.-PRC Diplomatic Relations, January 1, 1979"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3.  Taiwan Relations Act, April 10, 19794.  U.S.-PRC Joint Communiqué, August 17, 1982; 5.  Guidelines for National Unification,February 23, 1991; 6.  Continue to Promote the Reunification of China(The Eight-Point Policy by Jiang Zemin),January 30, 1995; 7.  Anti-Secession Law, March 2005; About the Authors; Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","A concise and informative history of how China divided in 1949 into two regimes, why they struggled to achieve the same political goal-reunification of China?and why their struggle today continues in a more complex and dangerous way. The authors detail how the changes brought about by the 2000 election not only intensified the conflict between the regimes but locked both sides into a new contest that increased the probability of war rather than peace."]