{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":33,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":33,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[20,2,20,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[31,2,31,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996388924603316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"By the King, a proclamation, for apprehending and securing the persons of Doctor Gaylard, apprentice to Nathaniel Mist of Great Carter-Lane, in the City of London, printer, and of Nathaniel Wilkinson [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London, : printed by John Baskett, printer to the Kings most excellent Majesty, and by the assigns of Thomas Newcomb, and Henry Hills, deceas'd, 1721"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 sheet ([1] p.)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Fugitives from justice - Great Britain"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Bounties - Great Britain"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Censorship - Great Britain"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Libel and slander - Great Britain"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Great Britain History George I, 1714-1727 Early works to 1800"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","\"Given at our court at St. James's, the eleventh day of June, in the seventh year of our reign\"."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Steele notation: in the Our. There is a capital letter A on the right of the final line of the black letter text."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reproduction of original in the British Library."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","eebo-0018"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910373943903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Esfeld Michael"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Science and Human Freedom / / by Michael Esfeld"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Palgrave Macmillan, , 2020"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9783030377717"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3030377717"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 2020.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (200 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"501"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Science - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Metaphysics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Philosophy of Science"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"1.Matter in Motion: the scientific image of the world -- 2. How Science Explains: scientific explanations and their limits -- 3. Why the Mind Matters: the manifest image of the world. ."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book argues for two claims: firstly, determinism in science does not infringe upon human free will because it is descriptive, not prescriptive, and secondly, the very formulation, testing and justification of scientific theories presupposes human free will and thereby persons as ontologically primitive. The argument against predetermination is broadly Humean, or more precisely ‘Super-Humean’, whereas that against naturalist reduction is in large Kantian, drawing from Sellars on the scientific and the manifest image. Thus, whilst the book defends scientific realism against the confusion between fact and fake, it also reveals why scientific theories, laws and explanations cannot succeed in imposing norms for our actions upon us, neither on the level of the individual nor on that of society. Esfeld makes a strong case for an ontology of science that is minimally sufficient to explain our scientific and common sense knowledge, not only removing the concern that thelaws of nature are incompatible with human freedom, but furthermore showing how our freedom is in fact a very presupposition for science."]