{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":34,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":34,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[14,2,14,3],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[29,2,29,3],[30,2,30,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996386521103316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Hicks Thomas <17th cent.>"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Three dialogues between a Christian and a Quaker [[electronic resource] ] : wherein is faithfully represented, some of the chief and most concerning opinions of the Quakers : together with their method and manner of reasoning in the defence thereof : unto which is now annexed The Quakers appeal answered, being a full relation of a dispute betwixt William Pen and the author / / published ... by Thomas Hicks"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London, : Printed, and are to be sold by Peter Parker ..., 1679"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"[2], 94; [8], 88; [8], 88; [12], 32, [4] p"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Society of Friends - Doctrines"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Society of Friends"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","In four parts, each with separate title page, register and registration; part 2 has title: A continuation of the dialogue between a Christian and a Quaker; part 3 has title: The Quaker condemned out of his own mouth; part 4 has title: The Quakers appeal ansvver'd."]
[{"$nulls":4},"In part a reply to William Penn."]
[{"$nulls":4},"The first three parts have running title: A dialogue between a Christain and a Quaker."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reproduction of the original in the Harvard University Library."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"A dialogue between a Christian and a Quaker -- A continuation of the dialogue between a Christian and a Quaker -- The Quaker condemned out of his own mouth, or, An answer to Will. Pen's book entituled Reason against railing, and truth against fiction -- The Quakers appeal answer'd, or, A full relation of the occasion, progress, and issue of a meeting held in Barbican, the 28th of August last past."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","eebo-0113"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910137034303321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Hohlefelder Olaf"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Kollektivierung und Opt-Out : Die neue Grundnorm des Urheberrechts? : Modelle im Vergleich: Google Books Settlement, §1371 UrhG, Richtlinie Orphan Works und die Wahrnehmungsbefugnis der VG Wort / / Olaf Hohlefelder"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Göttingen : , : Universitätsverlag Göttingen, , 2015"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2016"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resorce (353 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Open Access e-Books"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Knowledge Unlatched"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"347.731"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"346.430482"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Copyright - Germany"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Industrial property - Germany"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Intellectual property - Germany"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Tedesco"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (pages [339]-353)"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The German Copyright Law grants an absolute right to authors, i.e., any use of protected works requires the author's prior consent. This concept is known as opt-in. In this doctoral thesis the author examines five models which turn this concept upside down as they provide for the permission for certain beneficiaries to use protected works without the author's prior consent until the author objects to such use. This concept is known as opt-out. Also, the examined models contain elements of collectivization and, in particular, involve collecting societies. The author examines and compares these models and answers the question whether the underlying opt-out concept together with collectivization may be generalized so that it could replace opt-in."]