{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":53,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":53,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[9,2,9,3],[9,4,9,5],[10,2,10,3],[10,4,10,5],[11,2,11,3],[11,4,11,5],[12,2,12,3],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,17,3],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[29,2,29,3],[32,2,32,3],[32,4,32,5],[33,2,33,3],[33,4,33,5],[34,2,34,3],[34,4,34,5],[35,2,35,3],[37,2,37,3],[39,2,39,3],[40,2,40,3],[41,2,41,3],[42,2,42,3],[43,2,43,3],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3],[50,2,50,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA990001046290203316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Notizie dalla biblioteca / Corte Suprema di Cassazione, Centro elettronico di documentazione"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Roma"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"v ; 24 cm"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"016."]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Corte di Cassazione. Centro elettronico di documentazione -- Biblioteca -- Cataloghi"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996309231803316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Peter Matthias"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Die Bundesrepublik im KSZE-Prozess 1975-1983 : die Umkehrung der Diplomatie / / Matthias Peter"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"De Gruyter, 2015"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Berlin, [Germany] ; ; Munich, [Germany] ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : De Gruyter Oldenbourg, , 2015"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2015"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-11-034547-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3-11-039664-5"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (604 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Quellen und Darstellungen zur Zeitgeschichte, , 0481-3545 ; ; Band 105"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"NQ 6210"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"327.43009045"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"HISTORY / General"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Germany (West) Foreign relations Europe"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Europe Foreign relations Germany (West)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Tedesco"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Inhalt -- Danksagung / Peter, Matthias -- Einleitung -- Prolog: 9. Mai 1975: Die KSZE und das Gedenken an den Zweiten Weltkrieg -- I. Die Rahmenbedingungen des KSZE- Prozesses -- II. Zweierlei Junktim: Von der Europäischen Sicherheitskonferenz zur Konferenz über Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa (1954/55-1975) -- III. Die Schlussakte implementieren: Von Helsinki nach Belgrad (1975-1977) -- IV. Im Zeichen der Menschenrechte: Das Belgrader KSZE-Folgetreffen (1977/78) -- V. Der Primat der Sicherheit: Die KSZE zwischen Menschenrechten und Rüstungskontrolle (1978-1980) -- VI. Das zweite KSZE-Folgetreffen in Madrid (1980-1983) -- Schluss: Die Bundesrepublik im KSZE-Prozess (1975-1983) -- Tabellen -- Quellen- und Literaturverzeichnis -- Personenregister"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Die KSZE-Schlussakte vom 1. August 1975 war eine wichtige Wegmarke der bundesdeutschen Außenpolitik. Im Mittelpunkt der breit recherchierten Studie von Matthias Peter steht die Frage, wie Bonn die Multilateralisierung seiner Ostpolitik entspannungspolitisch nutzte. Sie widmet sich zunächst den Schwierigkeiten, die Helsinki-Empfehlungen zu implementieren und zahlreiche menschliche Erleichterungen durchzusetzen. Nach dem enttäuschenden Verlauf des ersten "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Folgetreffens in Belgrad 1977/78 geriet der KSZE-Prozess in den Sog des neuerlichen Klimasturzes zwischen West und Ost sowie der damit verknüpften Auseinandersetzung um Aufrüstung und Rüstungskontrolle. Auf dem zweiten Folgetreffen in Madrid 1980 bis 1983 setzten sich Außenminister Hans-Dietrich Genscher und das Auswärtige Amt deshalb nachdrücklich dafür ein, die Konferenz als Instrument der Krisensteuerung zu erhalten, die Ost-West-Détente zu bewahren und den Eisernen Vorhang durchlässiger zu machen. Die Bonner KSZE-Politik, so wird deutlich, ist dabei nur als hoch komplexer Lernprozess mit offenem Ausgang zu verstehen."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996208494003316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Finn Daniel P."]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Managing the ocean resources of the United States : the role of the federal marine sanctuaries program / / Daniel P. Finn"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Berlin, Heidelberg : , : Springer-Verlag, , [1982]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©1982"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-118-66968-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3-642-45537-9"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 1982.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (X, 196 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Lecture Notes on Coastal and Estuarine Studies ; ; Volume 2"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"333.91640973"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Marine resources - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Marine parks and reserves - United States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"I. Introduction -- II. Case Studies -- A. Conflicting Statutory Policies and Programs — OCS Oil and Gas Lease Sale No. 42 (Georges Bank) of the Department of the Interior -- B. Overlapping Regulatory Authority — The Santa Barbara Channel and the Channel Islands -- C. Gaps in Statutory Authority to Manage and Protect Outer Continental Shelf Resources — Historical Objects and Living Resources -- III. Interagency Coordination for the Management of marine Resources -- A. The Sructure of Federal Marine Programs -- B. Problems in Interagency Coordination for Marine Resources Management -- IV. The Marine Sanctuaries Program -- 1. Inherent Problems -- 2. History and Past Management -- 3. Political Factors -- 4. Organizational Considerations -- V. The Role of Designating Marine areas for Special Management -- 1. Broadened Institutional Perspective -- 2. Interagency Accommodation and Executive Coordination -- 3. Public Participation -- 4. Management Advantages -- 5. Facilitation of New Uses -- 6. International Considerations -- 7. Intergovernmental Coordination -- 8. Regulatory Flexibility -- VI. Recommendations and Conclusions -- A. Recommendations for the Design and Implementation of the Special Area Designation Process -- B. Conclusions -- Notes -- Alphabetical List of Major References."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Federal programs applicable to the oceans and coastal zone have evolved incrementally in response to perceived needs to expedite emerging mari­ time development while conserving valuable marine "]
[{"$nulls":4},"resources. As a re­ sult, the current federal marine effort is divided among a plethora of programs administered by a number of agencies within different Depart­ ments. The programs themselves are conducted under the authority of multiple statutes with varying reaches and objectives: as a result they often overlap and conflict. There is no assurance, moreover, that the coverage of federal programs is complete in scope or comprehensive in conception. No single institutional device can ensure that these pro­ grams will manage the marine resources of the United States consistent­ ly and comprehensively, so as to derive maximum public benefit. While the present maze of statutes, regulations, and executive directives may in theory provide opportunities for a wide-ranging consideration of all relevant factors prior to making specific decisions, there can be no guarantee that this objective is realized either systematically or rea­ sonably effectively. Recent political developments indicate that the structure of federal marine programs will continue to be subject to scrutiny for some time. President Reagan's emphases on economic deregulation and development of outer continental shelf (OCS) oil and gas resources may lead to stream­ lining the OCS leasing and permitting process and altering the execu­ tion of the federal multiple use policy for marine areas."]