{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":22,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":22,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[15,2,15,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9911004716203321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Approaches to risk management in remediation of radioactively contaminated sites [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Bethesda, MD, : National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement, c2004"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4294-7992-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-60119-211-8"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (291 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"NCRP report ; ; no. 146"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"363.72/89"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Radioactive waste sites - Risk assessment"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Risk management"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","\"Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; issued October 15, 2004.\""]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 238-256) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"Cover\"\"; \"\"Preface\"\"; \"\"Contents\"\"; \"\"Executive Summary\"\"; \"\"Extended Summary\"\"; \"\"1. Introduction\"\"; \"\"1.1 Purpose and Scope\"\"; \"\"1.2 NCRP Process\"\"; \"\"1.3 Outline of the Report\"\"; \"\"2. Current Regulatory Guidance and Practice\"\"; \"\"2.1 Principal Governing Laws and Organizational Structure\"\"; \"\"2.1.1 Governing Laws and Organizational Structure of NRC\"\"; \"\"2.1.2 Governing Laws and Organizational Structure of EPA\"\"; \"\"2.1.3 Relationships Between NRC or EPA and the States\"\"; \"\"2.2 Regulations for Remediation of Radioactively Contaminated Sites\"\"; \"\"2.2.1 NRC Regulations\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"2.2.2 EPA Regulations\"\"\"\"2.2.3 Comparison of NRC and EPA Regulations\"\"; \"\"2.2.4 Decision Process in Decommissioning of Contaminated Sites\"\"; \"\"2.2.5 Role of States in Remediation of Licensed Facilities\"\"; \"\"2.2.6 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Impact on Radioactively Contaminated Sites\"\"; \"\"2.3 Methods of Site Characterization and Dose or Risk Assessment\"\"; \"\"2.3.1 EPA Calculation Methods\"\"; \"\"2.3.2 NRC Calculation Methods\"\"; \"\"2.3.3 DOE Methods: The Residual Radiation (RESRAD) Family of Codes\"\"; \"\"3. Analysis of Regulatory Guidance and Practice\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"3.1 Principal Governing Laws and Organizational Structures\"\"\"\"3.1.1 Differences in Governing Laws\"\"; \"\"3.1.2 Commonalities in Governing Laws\"\"; \"\"3.1.3 Organizational Structures and Functions\"\"; \"\"3.2 Regulations for Remediation of Radioactively Contaminated Sites\"\"; \"\"3.2.1 Different Approaches to Regulation by NRC and EPA\"\"; \"\"3.2.2 "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Commonalities in Approaches to Regulation by NRC and EPA\"\"; \"\"3.2.3 Comparison of NRC and EPA Remediation Standards\"\"; \"\"3.2.4 Discussion of Origins of Different Approaches to Regulation\"\"; \"\"3.3 Methods of Site Characterization and Dose or Risk Assessment\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"3.3.1 Methods of Site Characterization and Verification\"\"\"\"3.3.2 Methods of Dose or Risk Assessment\"\"; \"\"3.3.3 Comparison of EPA Preliminary Remediation Goals with NRC Screening Levels\"\"; \"\"3.3.4 Analysis of 239Pu Remediation Levels for 10 Cases\"\"; \"\"3.3.5 Uncertainties in Assessments of Dose or Risk at Contaminated Sites\"\"; \"\"4. Practical Decision Making at Specific Sites\"\"; \"\"4.1 Discussion of Case Studies\"\"; \"\"4.1.1 Fernald and Rocky Flats: End-Use Considerations\"\"; \"\"4.1.2 West Valley Demonstration Project: Multiple Regulation of a Complex Site\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"4.1.3 The Johns Hopkins and the Environmental Law Institute Study\"\"\"\"4.1.4 Paducah, Brookhaven and Fernald: The Importance of Trust\"\"; \"\"4.1.5 Case Studies by the Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council\"\"; \"\"4.1.6 Observations on Practical Remediations\"\"; \"\"4.2 Recurrent Themes Observed in the Case Studies\"\"; \"\"4.2.1 Assumptions About Future Use of Sites, as Well as Assessments of Off-Site Risks, Drive Risk Management Decision Making\"\"; \"\"4.2.2 Public Participation, Input and Acceptance are Critical for Successful Risk Management\"\"; \"\"4.2.3 Distributive and Procedural Fairness\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"4.2.4 Various Approaches are Used Across Sites to Assess and Manage Risks\"\""]