{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910972442003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Burles Mark <1970->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Patterns in China's use of force : evidence from history and doctrinal writings / / Mark Burles, Abram N. Shulsky"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Santa Monica, CA, : Rand, c2000"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-8330-7597-7"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (111 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"355/.00951"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Strategy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"China Defenses"]
[{"$nulls":4},"China History, Military 1949-"]
[{"$nulls":4},"China Military relations United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"United States Military relations China"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","\"MR-1160-AF.\""]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-106)."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","China has often used force in ways that surprise and perplex other countries, when the overall military balance is unfavourable. Things have now changed however, there are no longer two superpowers to play off against each other and after decades of economic development, China now has more to lose."]