{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":26,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":26,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[16,2,16,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910970759203321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"National infrastructure : protecting, funding, and rebuilding / / Frederick H. Lupul, editor"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, : Nova Science Publishers, c2009"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-61470-344-2"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (256 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Terrorism, hot spots and conflict-related issues"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"363.325/170973"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Terrorism - United States - Prevention"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Infrastructure (Economics) - Security measures - United States - Planning"]
[{"$nulls":4},"National security - United States - Planning"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 228-230) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Intro -- NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE:PROTECTING, FUNDING ANDREBUILDING -- NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE:PROTECTING, FUNDING ANDREBUILDING -- CONTENTS -- LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES -- PREFACE∗ -- LETTER OF AGREEMENT -- SIGNATORIES -- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY -- 1. INTRODUCTION -- 2. AUTHORITIES, ROLES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES -- 3. THE CI/KR PROTECTION PROGRAM STRATEGY: MANAGING RISK -- 4. ORGANIZING AND PARTNERING FOR CI/KR PROTECTION -- 5. CI/KR PROTECTION: AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE HOMELANDSECURITY MISSION -- 6. ENSURING AN EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT PROGRAMOVER THE LONG TERM -- 7. PROVIDING RESOURCES FOR THE CI/KR PROTECTION PROGRAM -- Chapter 11. INTRODUCTION -- 1.1. PURPOSE -- 1.2. SCOPE -- 1.3. APPLICABILITY -- 1.3.1. Goal -- 1.3.2. The Value Proposition -- 1.4. THREATS TO THE NATION'S CI/KR -- 1.4.1. The Vulnerability of the U.S. Infrastructure to 21st Century Threats -- 1.4.2. The Nature of Possible Terrorist Attacks -- 1.5. ALL-HAZARDS AND CI/KR PROTECTION -- 1.6. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS -- 1.6.1. Sector-Specific Nature of CI/KR Protection -- 1.6.2. Cross-Sector Dependencies and Interdependencies -- 1.6.3. Adaptive Nature of the Terrorist Threat -- 1.6.4. All-Hazards Nature of CI/KR Protection -- 1.7. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS -- 1.7.1 Protection of Sensitive Information -- 1.7.2. The Cyber Dimension -- 1.7.3. The Human Element -- 1.7.4. International CI/KR Protection -- 1.8. ACHIEVING THE GOAL OF THE NIPP -- 1.8.1. Understanding and Sharing Information -- 1.8.2. Building Security Partnerships -- 1.8.3. "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Implementing a Long-Term CI/KR Risk Management Program -- 1.8.4. Maximizing Efficient Use of Resources for CI/KR Protection -- Chapter 22.AUTHORITIES, ROLES, AND RESPONSIBILITIES -- 2.1. AUTHORITIES -- 2.2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES -- 2.2.1. Department of Homeland Security -- 2.2.2. Sector-Specific Agencies -- 2.2.3. Other Federal Departments, Agencies, and Offices."]
[{"$nulls":4},"2.2.4. State, Local, and Tribal Governments -- 2.2.4.1. State and Territorial Governments -- 2.2.4.2. Local Governments -- 2.2.4.3. Tribal Governments -- 2.2.4.4. Regional Partners -- 2.2.4.5 Boards, Commissions, Authorities, Councils, and Other Entities -- 2.2.5. Private Sector Owners and Operators -- 2.2.6. Advisory Councils -- 2.2.7. Academia and Research Centers -- Chapter 33. THE PROTECTION PROGRAM STRATEGY:MANAGING RISK -- 3.1. SET SECURITY GOALS -- 3.2. IDENTIFY ASSETS, SYSTEMS, NETWORKS, AND FUNCTIONS -- 3.2.1. National Infrastructure Inventory -- 3.2.2. Protecting and Accessing Inventory Information -- 3.2.3. SSA Roles in Inventory Development and Maintenance -- 3.2.4. State Roles in Inventory Development and Maintenance -- 3.2.5. Identifying Cyber Infrastructure -- 3.2.6. Identifying Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Services -- 3.3. ASSESS RISKS -- 3.3.1. NIPP Baseline Criteria for Assessment Methodologies -- 3.3.1.1. Ensuring That Previous Assessments Can Be Used -- 3.3.1.2. Baseline Criteria -- 3.3.2. Consequence Analysis -- 3.3.2.1. Consequence Assessment Methodologies That Enable National Risk Analysis -- 3.3.2.2. Consequence Screening -- 3.3.3. Vulnerability Assessment -- 3.3.3.1. Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies That Enable National Risk Analysis -- 3.3.3.2. SSA and DHS Analysis Responsibilities -- 3.3.4. Threat Analysis -- 3.3.4.1 Key Aspects of the Terrorist Threat to CI/KR -- 3.3.4.2. Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center -- 3.4. PRIORITIZE -- 3.4.1. The Prioritization Process -- 3.4.2. Tailoring Prioritization Approaches to Sector Needs -- 3.4.3. The Uses of Prioritization -- 3.5. IMPLEMENT PROTECTIVE PROGRAMS -- 3.5.1. Protective Actions -- 3.5.2. Characteristics of Effective Protective Programs -- 3.5.3. Protective Programs, Initiatives, and Reports -- 3.6.MEASURE EFFECTIVENESS."]
[{"$nulls":4},"3.6.1. NIPP Metrics and Measures -- 3.6.1.1. Measuring Performance -- 3.6.1.2. Core Metrics and Sector-Specific Metrics -- 3.6.2. Gathering Performance Information -- 3.6.3. Assessing Performance and Reporting on Progress -- 3.7. USING METRICS AND PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FORCONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT -- Chapter 44. ORGANIZING AND PARTNERING FOR CI/KR PROTECTION -- 4.1. LEADERSHIP AND COORDINATION MECHANISMS -- 4.1.1. National-Level Coordination -- 4.1.2. Sector Partnership Coordination -- 4.1.2.1. Private Sector Cross-Sector Council -- 4.1.2.2. Government Cross-Sector Council -- 4.1.2.3. Sector Coordinating Councils -- 4.1.2.4. Government Coordinating Councils -- 4.1.2.5. Critical Infrastructure Partnership Advisory Council -- 4.1.3. Regional Coordination and the Partnership Model -- 4.1.4. International CI/KR Protection Cooperation -- 4.1.4.1. Cooperation with International Security Partners -- 4.1.4.2. Implementing Current Agreements -- 4.1.4.3. Approach to International Cyber Security -- 4.1.4.4. Foreign Investment in CI/KR -- 4.2. INFORMATION SHARING: A NETWORK APPROACH -- 4.2.1. Information Sharing between NIPP Security Partners -- 4.2.2. Information-Sharing Life Cycle -- 4.2.2.1. Information Requirement -- 4.2.2.2. Balancing the Sharing and Protection of Information -- 4.2.2.3. Top-Down and Bottom-Up Sharing -- 4.2.2.4. Decisions and Actions -- 4.2.3. The Information-Sharing Approach -- 4.2.3.1. Information Sharing With HSIN -- 4.2.4. The Federal Intelligence Node -- 4.2.5. The Federal Infrastructure Node "]
[{"$nulls":4},"-- 4.2.6. State, Local, Tribal, and Regional Node -- 4.2.7. Private Sector Node -- 4.2.8. DHS Operations Node -- 4.2.8.1. National Operations Center [21] -- 4.2.8.2. National Coordinating Center for Telecommunications -- 4.2.8.3. United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team -- 4.2.9. Other Information-Sharing Nodes."]
[{"$nulls":4},"4.3. PROTECTION OF SENSITIVE CI/KR INFORMATION -- 4.3.1. Protected Critical Infrastructure Information Program -- 4.3.1.1. PCII Program Office -- 4.3.1.2. Critical Infrastructure Information Protection -- 4.3.1.3. Uses of PCII -- 4.3.1.4. PCII Protections and Authorized Users -- 4.3.2. Other Information Protection Protocols -- 4.3.2.1. Sensitive Security Information -- 4.3.2.2. Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information -- 4.3.2.3. Freedom of Information Act Exemptions and Exclusions -- 4.3.2.4. Classified Information -- 4.3.2.5. Physical and Cyber Security Measures -- 4.4. PRIVACY AND CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS -- Chapter 55. INTEGRATING CI/KR PROTECTION AS PART OF THE HOMELAND SECURITY MISSION -- 5.1. A COORDINATED NATIONAL APPROACHTO THE HOMELAND SECURITY MISSION -- 5.1.1. Legislation -- 5.1.2. Strategies -- 5.1.2.1. The National Strategy for Homeland Security -- 5.1.2.2. The National Strategy for the Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key Assets -- 5.1.2.3. The National Strategy to Secure Cyberspace -- 5.1.3. Homeland Security Presidential Directives and National Initiatives -- 5.1.3.1. HSPD-3, Homeland Security Advisory System -- 5.1.3.2. HSPD-5, Management of Domestic Incidents -- 5.1.3.3. HSPD-7, Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, and Protection -- 5.1.3.4. HSPD-8, National Preparedness -- 5.2. THE CI/KR PROTECTION COMPONENTOF THE HOMELAND SECURITY MISSION -- 5.3. RELATIONSHIP OF THE NIPP AND SSPS TO OTHER CI/KRPLANS AND PROGRAMS -- 5.3.1. Sector-Specific Plans -- 5.3.2. State, Regional, Local, and Tribal CI/KR Protection Programs -- 5.3.3. Other Security Partner Plans or Programs Related to CI/KRProtection -- 5.4. CI/KR PROTECTION AND INCIDENT MANAGEMENT -- 5.4.1. The National Response Plan -- 5.4.2. Transitioning From NIPP Steady-State to Incident Management."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Chapter 66. ENSURING AN EFFECTIVE,EFFICIENT PROGRAM OVER THE LONG TERM -- 6.1. BUILDING NATIONAL AWARENESS -- 6.2. ENABLING EDUCATION, TRAINING,AND EXERCISE PROGRAMS -- 6.2.1. Types of Expertise for CI/KR Protection -- 6.2.2. Individual Education and Training -- 6.2.2.1. Technical CI/KR Protection Training -- 6.2.2.2. Academic and Research Programs -- 6.2.2.3. Continuing Education and Professional Competency -- 6.2.3. Organizational Training and Exercises -- 6.2.4. Security Partner Role and Approach -- 6.3. Conducting Research and Development and Using Technology -- 6.3.1. R&amp -- D Programs -- 6.3.2. The SAFETY Act -- 6.3.3. National Critical Infrastructure Protection R&amp -- D Plan -- 6.3.3.1 CI/KR Protection R&amp -- D Strategic Goals -- 6.3.3.2. CI/KR Protection R&amp -- D Areas -- 6.3.3.3. CI/KR Protection R&amp -- D Roadmap -- 6.3.3.4. Coordination of NCIP R&amp -- D Plan With SSP R&amp -- D Planning -- 6.3.4. Cyber Security R&amp -- D Planning -- 6.3.5. Other R&amp -- D That Supports CI/KR Protection -- 6.3.6. Technology Pilot Programs -- 6.4. BUILDING, PROTECTING, AND MAINTAINING DATABASES,SIMULATIONS, AND OTHER TOOLS -- 6.4.1. National CI/KR Protection Data Systems -- 6.4.2. Simulation and Modeling -- 6.4.3. Coordination with Security Partners on Databases and Modeling -- 6.5. CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING THE NIPP AND THE SSPS -- 6.5.1. Management and Coordination -- 6.5.2. Maintenance and Updating -- Chapter 77. PROVIDING RESOURCES FOR THE CI/KRPROTECTION PROGRAM -- 7.1. THE RISK-BASED RESOURCE "]
[{"$nulls":4},"ALLOCATION PROCESS -- 7.1.1. Sector-Specific Agency Reporting to DHS -- 7.1.2. State Government Reporting to DHS -- 7.1.3. Aggregating Submissions to DHS -- 7.2. FEDERAL RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROCESS FOR DHS, THESSAS, AND OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES -- 7.2.1. Department of Homeland Security -- 7.2.2. Sector-Specific Agencies."]
[{"$nulls":4},"7.2.3. Summary of Roles and Responsibilities."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Protecting the critical infrastructure and key resources (CI/KR) of the United States is essential to the Nation's security, public health and safety, economic vitality, and way of life. Attacks on CI/KR could significantly disrupt the functioning of government and business alike and produce cascading effects far beyond the targeted sector and physical location of the incident. Direct terrorist attacks and natural, manmade, or technological hazards could produce catastrophic losses in terms of human casualties, property destruction, and economic effects, as well as profound damage to public morale and confidence. Attacks using components of the Nation's CI/KR as weapons of mass destruction could have even more devastating physical and psychological consequences."]