{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910959210103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Fine Gail"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"On ideas : Aristotle's criticism of Plato's theory of forms / / Gail Fine"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Oxford, : Clarendon Press"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Oxford ; ; New York, : Oxford University Press, 1993"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-19-159739-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-19-151951-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-282-05191-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612051913"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (417 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"111.2"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Form (Philosophy)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Universals (Philosophy)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Includes Greek text and English translation of Aristotle's Peri ideon (p. [1]-19)."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [367]-376) and indexes."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"1. Introduction\"\"\"\"2. The first Argument from the Sciences\"\"; \"\"3. The second Argument from the Sciences\"\"; \"\"4. The third Argument from the Sciences\"\"; \"\"5. Conclusion\"\"; \"\"6. FORMS OF ARTEFACTS\"\"; \"\"7. PLATO AND THE ARGUMENTS FROM THE SCIENCES\"\"; \"\"1. Socrates and the Arguments from the Sciences\"\"; \"\"2. Plato and the premisses of the Arguments from the Sciences\"\"; \"\"3. Plato and the conclusion of the Arguments from the Sciences\"\"; \"\"4. The Imperfection Argument\"\"; \"\"5. Broad compresence\"\"; \"\"6. Artefact forms again\"\"; \"\"8. THE ONE OVER MANY ARGUMENT: FORMS AND PREDICATION\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"1. Introduction\"\"\"\"2. The One over Many Argument\"\"; \"\"3. What is predicated?\"\"; \"\"4. Negations\"\"; \"\"5. Plato's One over Many Argument\"\"; \"\"6. Forms of negations?\"\"; \"\"7. Separation\"\"; \"\"9. THE OBJECT OF THOUGHT ARGUMENT: FORMS AND THOUGHT\"\"; \"\"1. Introduction\"\"; \"\"2. The Object of Thought Argument\"\"; \"\"3. Aristotle's first objection to the Object of Thought Argument\"\"; \"\"4. Aristotle's second objection to the Object of Thought Argument\"\"; \"\"5. Plato and the Object of Thought Argument\"\"; \"\"6. Conclusion\"\"; \"\"10. THE ARGUMENT FROM RELATIVES\"\"; \"\"1. Introduction\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"2. An overview of the argument\"\"\"\"3. Homonymy, synonymy, and focal connection\"\"; \"\"4. A puzzle\"\"; \"\"5. A second puzzle\"\"; \"\"6. Why equality is homonymous if it is defined in sensible terms\"\"; \"\"7. How to avoid "]
[{"$nulls":4},"homonymy\"\"; \"\"8. How the Argument from Relatives conceives forms\"\"; \"\"9. Why the Argument from the Relatives is a more accurate argument\"\"; \"\"10. Conclusion\"\"; \"\"11. COMPLETENESS AND COMPRESENCE: OWEN ON THE ARGUMENT FROM RELATIVES\"\"; \"\"1. Introduction\"\"; \"\"2. Completeness\"\"; \"\"3. Owen's account of the Argument from Relatives\"\"; \"\"4. Three criticisms\"\"; \"\"12. KATH' HAUTO AND PROS TI\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"1. Introduction\"\""]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Gail Fine's On Ideas is a study of Book 1 of Aristotle's short essay Peri Ideon, in which Aristotle presents a systematic account of a series of five arguments for the existence of Platonic forms along with a series of objections to each of these arguments."]