{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":23,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[18,2,18,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910956450603321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Strategies in academic discourse / / edited by Elena Tognini-Bonelli, Gabriella del Lungo Camiciotti"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Philadelphia, : J. Benjamins, 2005"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9786612156243"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9781282156241"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1282156241"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9789027293954"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9027293953"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"xi, 212 p"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Studies in corpus linguistics, , 1388-0373 ; ; v. 19"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"401/.41"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Discourse analysis"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Academic writing"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Papers selected from a conference on evaluation in academic discourse held June, 2003, at the Certosa di Pontignano, Siena."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Strategies in Academic Discourse -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Introduction -- References -- Conflict and consensus -- Introduction -- Value in conflict articles -- Attribution in conflict articles -- Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- The conflict corpus -- Subjective or objective evaluation? -- Introduction -- Academic lectures -- Frequencies -- Likely -- Probably -- Conclusions -- Notes -- References -- Aspects of identification and position  in intertextual reference in PhD theses -- Introduction -- Averral, intertextuality and intratextuality -- The corpus -- Results of analysis -- Conclusions chapters -- Conclusion -- Notes -- The corpus -- References -- Authorial presence in academic genres -- Introduction -- Data and methodology -- The corpus -- Quantitative and qualitative analysis -- Results -- Results obtained on whole corpora: General tendencies -- Context analysis of the correlations between PP, verbal tenses and verb types -- Evaluation grids -- Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- The Corpus -- Works by Deleuze -- Works by Macherey -- Pragmatic force in biology papers written  by British and Japanese scientists -- Introduction -- Research questions -- Data collection and data analysis -- Findings -- Common features between British and Japanese papers -- Differences between British and Japanese papers -- "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Discussion -- Shared use and differences between British and Japanese papers -- Conclusion and implications -- References -- Evaluation and pragmatic markers -- Introduction -- Pragmatic markers and indexicality -- Heteroglossia -- The multifunctionality of really - an illustration -- Really translated by `verkligen' -- Really translated by `i själva verket', `egentligen' -- Really translated as `faktiskt' -- Conclusion -- Appendix -- Note -- References."]
[{"$nulls":4},"``This seems somewhat  counterintuitive, though…'' -- Introduction: Book reviews, evaluation, and gender -- The empirical study: Exploring BRILC -- The Book Reviews In Linguistics Corpus (BRILC): Design and compilation -- Tracing negative evaluative expressions in BRILC -- Focussing on negative evaluative adjectives: Adjectival criticism and the value system of linguists -- Adjectival criticism and reviewer gender -- Hedged adjectival criticism and reviewer gender -- Theoretical implications: Rethinking language and gender relations -- Conclusion: The need for corpus-driven sociolinguistics -- Acknowledgements -- Notes -- References -- Is evaluation structure-bound? -- Introduction -- The study -- Data -- Method of analysis -- Results -- Move Analysis -- Evaluation in the corpus -- Conclusions -- Notes -- References -- From corpus to register -- Introduction -- Evaluation and argumentation -- Mechanisms of attribution and reporting -- Voices or participant roles -- Moves -- Modality and hedging -- Retrospective and prospective evaluation - Metadiscourse -- Attitudinal lexis -- Data and methodology -- Results and discussion -- Conclusion -- Notes -- References -- Corpus -- Appendix -- On the boundaries between evaluation  and metadiscourse -- Notes -- References -- Language as a string of beads -- Notes -- References -- Academic vocabulary in academic discourse -- Academic vocabulary -- Two problems: Coverage and the word family -- Evaluations - a lexical item? -- Frequent phraseological environments of EVALUATION -- Evaluation -- Evaluate -- Evaluates -- Evaluated -- Evaluating -- Evaluations -- Conclusions -- Notes -- References -- Evaluation and its discontents -- The remit of corpus linguistics -- The discourse as a play: Arguments against cognitive interpretations."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Deontic meanings and the speakers' opinions: Arguments against a `real world' interpretation -- Do corpus linguists need reality? -- Intertextual references -- Searching for ideological fingerprints -- Enlarging the context: New corpora for intertextuality -- Acknowledgments -- References -- Notes on contributors -- Index -- The series Studies in Corpus Linguistics."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book focuses on theoretical and descriptive issues and techniques in the study of text and discourse. Drawing on a large number of corpora containing academic language, from spoken language to published research papers, the authors approach their subject from multiple angles: The academic language of biology, literature, philosophy, economics, agriculture, linguistics and applied linguistics. The analysis of intertextual features these papers show leads to penetrating results."]