{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":26,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":26,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3],[23,2,23,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910817153603321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Judiciaries in comparative perspective / / edited by H.P. Lee [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-139-12444-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-21369-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-283-29592-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-12275-4"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613295927"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-11701-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-11265-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-99639-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-12767-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-11484-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (lvi, 567 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"LAW016000"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"347/.014"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Judges"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Comparative law"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Judicial independence and accountability : core values in liberal democracies / Shimon Shetreet -- Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in Australia / H.P. Lee -- Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in Canada / Martin L. Friedland -- Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in New Zealand / Philip A. Joseph -- Appointment, discipline and removal of judges in South Africa / Hugh Corder -- Appointment, discipline and removal of judges : fundamental reforms in the United Kingdom / Kate Malleson -- Judicial selection, removal and discipline in the United States / Mark Tushnet -- Judges' freedom of speech : Australia / John M. Williams -- Judges and free speech in Canada / Kent Roach -- Judges and free speech in New Zealand / Grant Hammond -- The judiciary and freedom of speech in South Africa / Iain Currie -- Judges and free speech in the United Kingdom / Keith D. Ewing -- The criticism and speech of judges in the United States / Charles Gardner Geyh -- Judges, bias and recusal in "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Australia / Colin Campbell -- Judges, bias and recusal in Canada / Lorne Sossin -- Judicial recusal in New Zealand / Gerard McCoy -- Judges, bias and recusal in South Africa / Kate O'Regan, Edwin Cameron -- Judges, bias and recusal in the United Kingdom / Christopher Forsyth -- Bias, the appearance of bias, and judicial disqualification in the United States / W. William Hodes -- Judges and non-judicial functions in Australia / Patrick Emerton, H.P. Lee -- The impact of extra-judicial service on the Canadian judiciary : the need for reform / Patrick Monahan, Byron Shaw -- Judges and the non-judicial function in New Zealand / Geoffrey Palmer -- Judges and non-judicial functions in South Africa / Cora Hoexter -- Judges and non-judicial functions in the United Kingdom / Abimbola A. Olowofoyeku -- Judges and non-judicial functions in the United States / Jeffrey M. Shaman -- The judiciary : a comparative conspectus / H.P. Lee."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","An independent and impartial judiciary is fundamental to the existence and operation of a liberal democracy. Focussing on Australia, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, the United Kingdom and the United States, this comparative 2011 study explores four major issues affecting the judicial institution. These issues relate to the appointment and discipline of judges; judges and freedom of speech; the performance of non-judicial functions by judges; and judicial bias and recusal, and each is set within the context of the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary. The essays highlight important episodes or controversies affecting members of the judiciary to illustrate relevant principles."]