{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[15,2,15,3],[15,4,15,5],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[31,2,31,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996396039903316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"[Litany and suffrages] [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"[London?, : s.n., 1554]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"[16+] p"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Litanies"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Prayers"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","T.p. lacking; title of publication suggested by STC (2nd ed.)."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Imprint of publication suggested by STC (2nd ed.)."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Initials."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Signatures: Aâ\u0081¸."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reproduction of original in: British Library."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","eebo-0018"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910816641503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"VanSickle-Ward Rachel <1977->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The devil is in the details : understanding the causes of policy specificity and ambiguity / / Rachel VanSickle-Ward"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Albany, New York : , : SUNY Press, , 2014"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2014"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4384-4924-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (243 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"328.73/077"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Legislation - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public policy (Law) - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Legislative bodies - United States - States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"The Devil is in the Details: Understanding the Causes of Policy Specificity and Ambiguity\"\"; \"\"Contents\"\"; \"\"List of Figures and Tables\"\"; \"\"Acknowledgments\"\"; \"\"Chapter 1: Introduction: The Political Story of Policy Precision\"\"; \"\"Fragmentation and Ambiguity\"\"; \"\"The Language of Law\"\"; \"\"Social Policy in the States\"\"; \"\"Overview of the Book\"\"; \"\"Chapter 2: The Puzzle of Statute Specificity\"\"; \"\"Fragmentation and Ambiguity in the Judicial Context\"\"; \"\"Fragmentation and Ambiguity in the Bureaucratic Context\"\"; \"\"Bureaucracy Research in the States\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"A Conditional Theory of Statute Specificity\"\"\"\"Salience in the Conditional Model\"\"; \"\"Assessing Specificity and Salience\"\"; \"\"Sources of Fragmentation\"\"; \"\"Party Control and Polarization\"\"; \"\"Interest Group Density and Diversity\"\"; \"\"Gubernatorial Powers\"\"; \"\"Speaker's Power\"\"; \"\"Capacity Variables: Legislative and Bureaucratic Professionalization and Term Limits\"\"; \"\"Summary of Hypotheses\"\"; \"\"Chapter 3: Perspectives of Policy-Making Elites\"\"; \"\"Methodology\"\"; \"\"Overcoming Fragmentation: Compromise through Ambiguity\"\"; \"\"The Role of Committees\"\"; \"\"Interest Groups and Stakeholders\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Partisan Conflict\"\"\"\"The Role of the Executive\"\"; \"\"Alternatives for Overcoming Fragmentation: Compromise through Specificity\"\"; \"\"The Role of Interest Groups Revisited\"\"; \"\"Fragmentation and Protecting the Status Quo\"\"; \"\"Committee Pressure for More Specificity\"\"; \"\"Specificity and Negotiations with the Executive Branch\"\"; \"\"Resources and Procedural Factors: Term limits, Turnover, and Time Constraints\"\"; "]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"How Salience Shapes Strategy: Articulating the Conditional Model\"\"; \"\"Something Old and Something New\"\"; \"\"Conclusion\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Chapter 4: Policy Specificity in a High-Salience Context: Mental Health Parity\"\"\"\"Mental Health Insurance\"\"; \"\"Specificity in State Mental Health Parity Statutes\"\"; \"\"Political and Institutional Fragmentation\"\"; \"\"Findings\"\"; \"\"Chapter 5: Policy Specificity in a Low-Salience Context: Individual Development Accounts\"\"; \"\"Individual Development Accounts\"\"; \"\"Assessing Specificity in IDA Bills\"\"; \"\"Sources of Fragmentation (Independent Variables)\"\"; \"\"Findings\"\"; \"\"Evidence for the Conditional Model of Fragmentation\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Chapter 6: Fragmentation and Policy Specificity in California Legislation\"\"\"\"The California Policy-Making Environment\"\"; \"\"Institutional Conditions\"\"; \"\"Political Conditions\"\"; \"\"Bill-Specific Variables\"\"; \"\"California Social Policy\"\"; \"\"Health Policy\"\"; \"\"Welfare Policy\"\"; \"\"Methodology\"\"; \"\"Measurement of the Dependent Variable: Recalibrating Statute Specificity\"\"; \"\"Hypotheses\"\"; \"\"Findings\"\"; \"\"Descriptive Findings\"\"; \"\"Multivariate Analyses\"\"; \"\"The Conditional Effects of Salience\"\"; \"\"Conclusion\"\"; \"\"Chapter 7: Conclusion\"\"; \"\"Review of Findings\"\"; \"\"Normative Implications\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"Directions for Future Research\"\""]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Seeks to explain the causes of ambiguously worded state legislation\"--Provided by publisher."]