{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910811818403321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Proposed revisions to the common rule : for the protection of human subjects in the behavioral and social sciences / / Committee on Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research in the Behavioral and Social Sciences [and five others]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, District of Columbia : , : The National Academies Press, , 2014"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2014"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-309-29809-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-309-29807-5"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (183 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"344.73041"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Social sciences - Research - Moral and ethical aspects"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Human experimentation in psychology"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences examines how to update human subjects protections regulations so that they effectively respond to current research contexts and methods. With a specific focus on social and behavioral sciences, this consensus report aims to address the dramatic alterations in the research landscapes that institutional review boards (IRBs) have come to inhabit during the past 40 years. The report aims to balance respect for the individual persons whose consent to participate makes research possible and respect for the social benefits that productive research communities make possible.\"--Publisher's description"]