{"text_format":"5","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"props":{"last_modified_by":"sharecat"},"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":50,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":50,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[43,2,43,3],[44,2,44,3],[48,2,48,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910811442203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Fedelino Annalisa"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Aid Scaling Up : : Do Wage Bill Ceilings Stand in the Way? / / Annalisa Fedelino, Gerd Schwartz, Marijn Verhoeven"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, D.C. : , : International Monetary Fund, , 2006"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4623-7301-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4527-7940-6"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-283-51308-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613825537"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4519-0900-4"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (37 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"IMF Working Papers"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Wages - Econometric models"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Labor policy - Econometric models"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Economic assistance - Econometric models"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Labor"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public Finance"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Fiscal Policy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Foreign Aid"]
[{"$nulls":4},"National Government Expenditures and Welfare Programs"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs: General"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Wage Level and Structure"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Wage Differentials"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public Sector Labor Markets"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Employment"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Unemployment"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Wages"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Intergenerational Income Distribution"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Aggregate Human Capital"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Aggregate Labor Productivity"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Incomes Policy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Price Policy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Labour"]
[{"$nulls":4},"income economics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Civil service & public sector"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public finance & taxation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public sector wages"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Wage adjustments"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Civil service reform"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Government wage bill"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Expenditure"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Civil service"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Ghana"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Note generali","\"April 2006.\""]
[{"$nulls":3},"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"Contents\"\"; \"\"I. INTRODUCTION\"\"; \"\"II. SCALING UP AID AND THE ROLE OF THE IMF\"\"; \"\"III. WHY WAGE BILL CEILINGS?\"\"; \"\"IV. WAGE BILL CONDITIONALITY IN PRACTICE\"\"; \"\"V. DO WAGE BILL CEILINGS ACCOMMODATE DONOR-FINANCED WAGE SPENDING IN PRIORITY SECTORS?\"\"; \"\"VI. IMPROVING WAGE BILL CONDITIONALITY\"\"; \"\"REFERENCES\"\""]
[{"$nulls":3},"Sommario/riassunto","This paper assesses whether the scaling up of aid and the resulting increase in government spending that is needed to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) would be hampered by wage bill ceilings that are often part of government programs supported by the IMF's Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Based on country case studies for 2003-05, the paper suggests that, in the past, wage bill ceilings have not restricted the use of available donor funds. Yet the paper offers a number of suggestions for further enhancing the flexibility of wage bill conditionality in PRGF-supported programs to respond to higher aid flows that may result in the future."]