{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":4,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":53,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":53,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[11,2,11,3],[11,4,11,5],[12,2,12,3],[12,4,12,5],[13,2,13,3],[13,4,13,5],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[19,2,19,3],[20,2,20,3],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[24,4,24,5],[25,2,25,3],[25,4,25,5],[26,2,26,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[30,2,30,3],[35,2,35,3],[36,2,36,3],[39,2,39,3],[39,4,39,5],[40,2,40,3],[40,4,40,5],[41,2,41,3],[41,4,41,5],[42,2,42,3],[44,2,44,3],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3],[47,2,47,3],[49,2,49,3],[50,2,50,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA990003920340403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Grimmett, Geoffrey R. <1950- >"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"One thousand exercises in probability / Geoffrey Grimmett, David Stirzaker"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York : Oxford University Press, 2001"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-19-857221-2"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"x, 438 p. ; 24 cm"]
[null,null,"Locazione",null,"MAS"]
[null,null,"Collocazione",null,"VI-A-68"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910169183403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Cárdenas Ana María Arango"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"¿Uno solo o varios mundos? : Diferencia, subjetividad y conocimientos en las ciencias sociales contemporáneas / / Mónica Zuleta Pardo, Humberto Cubides, Manuel Roberto Escobar"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Bogotá, : Siglo del Hombre Editores, 2017"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2-8218-7966-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (288 p.)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Social change"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Knowledge, Theory of"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Spagnolo"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Este libro desarrolla una discusión alrededor de las relaciones entre la producción, la circulación y la apropiación del conocimiento. Para ello se interroga por el signifi cado actual de algunos de los planteamientos que surgieron alrededor de la idea de crisis de la representación, después de trascurridos cuarenta años de su anuncio.  Lo que discuten hoy las distintas vertientes de las ciencias sociales críticas es la relación entre dos tendencias: una primera que afi rma la presencia de la despolitización del mundo y, con ella, la esclavitud colectiva, razón por la cual, la acción de las ciencias sociales debe encaminarse a sugerir caminos de conocimiento orientados al fraccionamiento de la dirección concentradora del capitalismo contemporáneo y, en consecuencia, a la re-construcción de varios mundos. La segunda corriente, en contraste, postula que lo que está ocurriendo hoy es la producción de una multiplicidad de mundos virtuales, por tanto, el conocimiento social debe participar de la creación de dichos mundos y proponer opciones para su actualización.  ¿Uno solo o varios mundos? intenta dar cuenta del debate alrededor de estas dos posiciones, junto con sus distintos matices. Esto es, de los efectos de la consigna ¡Muerte a la representación! en el territorio de las ciencias sociales latinoamericanas, y la manera como ellas pueden vincularse o no con las resistencias sociales y sus modos actuales de expresión."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910715351203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"McGrew Laura"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Lessons from Cambodia's Paris Peace Accords for political unrest today / / Laura McGrew, Scott Worden"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, D.C. : , : United States Institute of Peace, , 2017"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2017"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (4 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Peace brief ; ; 224"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Peace-building - Cambodia"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Elections - Cambodia"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Peace-building"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cambodia Politics and government"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Cambodia"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","\"May 2017.\""]
[null,"4.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910806944603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Eemeren F. H. van (Frans Hendrik), <1946->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Argumentation between doctors and patients : understanding clinical argumentative discourse / / Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Nanon Labrie"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , [2021]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2021"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"90-272-6010-9"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (167 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"610.696"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Medical consultation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Medical cooperation"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Argumentation between Doctors and Patients discusses the use of argumentation in clinical settings. Starting from the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, it aims at providing an understanding of argumentative discourse in the context of doctor-patient interaction. It explains when and how interactions between doctors and patients can be reconstructed as argumentative, what it means for doctors and patients to reasonably resolve a difference of opinion, what it implies to strive simultaneously for reasonableness and effectiveness in clinical discourse, and when such efforts derail into fallaciousness. Argumentation between Doctors and Patients is of interest to all those who seek to improve their understanding of argumentation in a medical context - whether they are students, scholars of argumentation, or medical practitioners. Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen and Nanon Labrie are prominent argumentation theorists. In writing Argumentation between Doctors and Patients, they have benefited from the advice of an Advisory Board consisting of both medical practitioners and argumentation scholars\"--"]