{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3],[21,2,21,3],[21,4,21,5],[22,2,22,3],[22,4,22,5],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[30,2,30,3],[32,2,32,3],[33,2,33,3],[37,2,37,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910461168803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Irmer Matthias"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Bridging inferences [[electronic resource] ] : constraining and resolving underspecification in discourse interpretation / / Matthias Irmer"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Berlin, : Walter de Gruyter, 2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-40267-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613402677"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3-11-026201-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (424 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Language, context, and cognition, , 1866-8313 ; ; v. 11"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"ET 760"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"400"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Discourse analysis"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and indexes."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- Introduction -- 1 Pragmatic Inferences -- 2 The Common Ground and Intentions in Conversations -- 3 The Discourse Model and Discourse Anaphora -- 4 Discourse Structure -- 5 Discourse Interpretation -- 6 Bridging Inferences -- 7 Bridges Between Events -- 8 Bridging by Clitic Left Dislocation -- Summary -- List of Figures and Tables -- List of Abbreviations -- A Note on Used Corpora -- Bibliography -- Citation Index -- Subject Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book presents work on bridging inferences in discourse interpretation. It develops a formalization that permits integrating indirect anaphora in the construction of a structured discourse representation. From a broader perspective, it provides a suitable dynamic-logic framework which can account for underspecifications in cohesion and coherence of discourses by either inferentially resolving or contextually constraining them. Special attention is given to the resolution of bridging anaphora by means of integrating encyclopedic knowledge encoded in FrameNet into a formal theory of discourse structure as provided by Segmented Discourse Representation Theory. A second focus lies on the discourse effects of Clitic Left Dislocation in Spanish.  In addition, the book provides a synopsis of the problems, methods, approaches, and desiderata of research on text, context, and discourse interpretation from formal, computational, cognitive, and psychological points of view. Central topics include pragmatic "]
[{"$nulls":4},"inferences and defeasible reasoning, the Common Ground, cohesion and anaphora resolution, coherence and discourse structure, and discourse interpretation. The volume may thus also serve as a reference book on text meaning and context."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910798600003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Chiu King Pong"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Thomé H. Fang, Tang Junyi and Huayan thought : a Confucian appropriation of Buddhist ideas in response to scientism in twentieth-century China / / by King Pong Chiu"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Leiden, Netherlands ; ; Boston, [Massachusetts] : , : Brill, , 2016"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2016"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"90-04-31388-5"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (274 pages) : illustrations, tables"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Modern Chinese Philosophy, , 1875-9386 ; ; Volume 8"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"181/.112"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Philosophy, Confucian"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Scientism"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Revision of author's thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Manchester, 2014."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Preliminary Material -- 1 Introduction: Research Questions and Methodology -- 2 The Historical Context of Modern Confucian Thinkers’ Appropriations of Buddhist Ideas -- 3 Thomé H. Fang and Huayan Thought -- 4 Tang Junyi and Huayan Thought -- 5 Fang’s and Tang’s Appropriations of Huayan Thought and ‘Scientism’ -- Appendix 1: Reply from the University of Wisconsin-Madison about Fang’s Status -- Appendix 2: Prolegomena to A Comparative Philosophy of Life: An Outline -- Bibliography -- Index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In Thomé H. Fang, Tang Junyi and Huayan Thought , King Pong Chiu discusses Thomé H. Fang and Tang Junyi, two of the most important Confucian thinkers in twentieth-century China, who appropriated aspects of the medieval Chinese Buddhist school of Huayan to develop a response to the challenges of ‘scientism’, the belief that quantitative natural science is the only valuable part of human learning and the only source of truth. As Chiu argues, Fang’s and Tang’s selective appropriations of Huayan thought paid heed to the hermeneutical importance of studying ancient texts in order to be more responsive to modern issues, and helped confirm the values of Confucianism under the challenge of ‘scientism’, a topic widely ignored in academia."]