{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":21,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":21,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[15,2,15,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910798285003321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Constructions across grammars / / edited by Martin Hilpert, Jan-Ola O<U+00cb><U+0086>stman"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Amsterdam ; ; Philadelphia : , : John Benjamins Publishing Company, , [2016]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"{copy}2016"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (214 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Benjamins current topics, , 1874-0081 ; ; 82"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"415.01/836"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Construction grammar"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Second language acquisition"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Multilingualism"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Constructions across Grammars; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Reflections on Constructions across Grammars; 1. Towards a multilingual Construction Grammar; 2. The contributions in this book; 3. The way ahead; References; On the borrowability of subject pronoun constructions in Turkish-Dutch contact; 1. Introduction; 2. Turks/Turkish in the Netherlands; 3. Subject pronoun use in language contact and change; 4. How to analyze subject pronouns?; 4.1 Problems with syntactic generalizations; 4.2 Problems with discourse-functional categories"]
[{"$nulls":4},"5. Analyzing subject pronouns through usage-based approaches6. How to detect Dutch influence on NL-Turkish; 6.1 Description of data; 6.2 Frequency analysis; 7. Unconventional NL-Turkish constructions with subject pronouns; 7.1 Constructional analysis; 7.2 Dutch influence on maximally specific constructions; 7.2.1 [I don't know] construction; 7.2.2 [As far as I know] construction; 7.3 Dutch influence on partially schematic constructions; 7.3.1 Subordinate constructions with subject pronouns; 7.3.2 Left Dislocation: addition of a new construction"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1. Constructions all the way down?2. The place of phonology in construction grammar; 2.1 Meaningful vs. distinctive elements; 2.2 Phonological form: simple and more complex cases; 3. Diasystematic Construction Grammar: A brief sketch; 3.1 Multilingualism and socio-cognitive realism; 3.2 Diaconstructions and idioconstructions; 4. Phonological language markers; 5. Concluding remarks; References; "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Clause combining across grammars; 1. Introduction; 2. Categories of analysis; 3. Description of the study; 3.1 Participants; 3.2 Data elicitation; 3.3 Text transcription, coding, and reliability"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4. Results4.1 Second language speakers as Advanced Speakers; 4.2 Rhetorical preferences in clause combining across grammars; 5. Structuring construal across grammars; References; Constructional tolerance; 1. Introduction; 2. Methodology; 2.1 Collecting acceptability judgments; 2.2 Stimuli; 2.3 Procedure and participants; 3. Results; 3.1 General analysis; 3.2 Factoring in the native acceptability ratings; 4. Summary and discussion; 4.1 Why are the English speakers tolerant towards the 'good' reflexive-motion sentences as well as the 'bad' ones?"]
[{"$nulls":4},"4.2 Why are the French speakers more tolerant towards the 'good' ditransitive sentences than the English speakers?"]