{"text_format":"5","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"props":{"last_modified_by":"sharecat"},"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":28,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":28,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[25,2,25,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910790616603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Shlapentokh Vladimir"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Freedom, repression, and private property in Russia / / Vladimir Shlapentokh, Michigan State University, Anna Arutunyan, Independent journalist [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2013"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-107-46188-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-139-89349-1"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-45972-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-316-60933-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-46539-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-47254-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-46894-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-32378-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-107-47352-7"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (vii, 208 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"947.086"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Democracy - Russia (Federation)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Civil rights - Russia (Federation)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Property - Political aspects - Russia (Federation)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Free enterprise - Political aspects - Russia (Federation)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Russia (Federation) Politics and government 1991-"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Note generali","Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)."]
[{"$nulls":3},"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Private property and big money in political regimes in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia: a theoretical overview -- Ideology and public opinion in a centralized society and in a fragmented society -- Corruption, the power of state and big business in the Soviet and post-Soviet regimes -- Enemies and the issue of legitimization in the Soviet and post-Soviet regimes -- Political police before and after -- Treatment of strikers in Soviet and post-Soviet times: Novocherkassk and Mezhdurechensk -- Foreign policy: the geopolitical factor before and money after -- A freedom which Putin dearly loves -- \"the right to leave his country.\""]
[{"$nulls":3},"Sommario/riassunto","This study demonstrates how the emergence of private property and a market economy after the Soviet Union's collapse enabled a degree of freedom while simultaneously supporting authoritarianism. Based on "]
[{"$nulls":4},"case studies, Vladimir Shlapentokh and Anna Arutunyan analyze how private property and free markets spawn feudal elements in society. These elements are so strong in post-Communist Russia that they prevent the formation of a true democratic society, while making it impossible to return to totalitarianism. The authors describe the resulting Russian society as having three types of social organization: authoritarian, feudal and liberal. The authors examine the adaptation of Soviet-era institutions like security forces, the police and the army to free market conditions and how they generated corruption; the belief that the KGB was relatively free from corruption; how large property holdings merge with power and necessitate repression; and how property relations affect government management and suppression."]