{"text_format":"5","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"props":{"last_modified_by":"sharecat"},"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":1},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[16,2,16,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910789642003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Samuel Simon"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"A postcolonial reading of Mark's story of Jesus [[electronic resource] /] / Simon Samuel"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London, : T&T Clark, c2007"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-27098-6"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613270986"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-567-26254-5"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (209 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Library of New Testament studies ; ; 340"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"226.306"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Postcolonialism"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[{"$nulls":3},"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Editorial Board; Title; CONTENTS; Preface; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; INTRODUCTION; Chapter 1 POSTCOLONIALISM AS A CRITICAL PRACTICE IN BIBLICAL STUDIES; Chapter 2 VIEWING THE DISCURSIVE WORLD OF MARK; Chapter 3 THE CURRENT MODELS OF POSTCOLONIAL READINGS OF MARK; Chapter 4 THE BEGINNING OF MARK: A MIMETIC DESIGN; Chapter 5 THE PORTRAIT OF JESUS IN MARK: A COLONIAL/POSTCOLONIAL CONUNDRUM; Chapter 6 CONCLUSION; Bibliography; Index of References; Index of Authors"]
[{"$nulls":3},"Sommario/riassunto","This unique contribution to Markan studies reads Mark's story of Jesus from a postcolonial perspective. It proposes that Mark need not necessarily be treated in an oversimplified polarity as an anti- or pro-colonial discourse. Instead it may be treated as a postcolonial discourse, i.e. as a hybrid discourse that accommodates and disrupts both the native Jewish and the Roman colonial discourses of power. It shows that Mark accommodates itself into a strategic third space in between the variegated native Jewish and the Roman colonial discourses in order to enunciate its own voice. As an ambivale"]