{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910788778203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Suber Peter"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The case of the speluncean explorers [[electronic resource] ] : nine new opinions / / Peter Suber"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London ; ; New York, : Routledge, 1998"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-134-66650-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-280-05033-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-203-08628-7"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786610050338"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4175-5908-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (123 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"340/.1"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Law - Philosophy"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"pt. 1. Lon Fuller's Case of the speluncean explorers -- pt. 2. Nine new options."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Lon L. Fuller published his \"The Case of the Speluncean Explorers\" in 1949 (Harvard Law Review, vol. 62, no. 4), an invented legal case with opinions by \"supreme court judges\" meant to reflect differing legal philosophies. It is reprinted here, with nine new opinions by Peter Suber."]