{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":60,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":60,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[36,2,36,3],[37,2,37,3],[41,2,41,3],[43,2,43,3],[43,4,43,5],[44,2,44,3],[44,4,44,5],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3],[47,2,47,3],[48,2,48,3],[50,2,50,3],[51,2,51,3],[53,2,53,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910788344203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Tervala Juha"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Tax Reforms, “Free Lunches”, and “Cheap Lunches” in Open Economies / / Juha Tervala, Giovanni Ganelli"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, D.C. : , : International Monetary Fund, , 2008"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4623-4368-6"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4527-1376-6"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4518-7085-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612841781"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-282-84178-5"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (32 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"IMF Working Papers"]
[{"$nulls":4},"IMF working paper ; ; WP/08/227"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"336.2"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Taxation - Econometric models"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public welfare - Econometric models"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Macroeconomics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public Finance"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Taxation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Business Taxes and Subsidies"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue: General"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Macroeconomics: Consumption"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Saving"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Wealth"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Public finance & taxation"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Consumption taxes"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Income and capital gains taxes"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Revenue administration"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Consumption"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Tax collection"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Spendings tax"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Income tax"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Revenue"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Economics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Tax administration and procedure"]
[{"$nulls":4},"United States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Contents; I. Introduction; II. The Model; A. Households; B. The Government; C. Firms; D. The Initial Steady State; III. Parameterization; IV. The Domestic and International Effects of a Cut in the Income Tax Rate; A. The Impact on the Domestic Economy; B. The International Effects; V. Consumption Tax Cuts; VI. A Revenue Neutral Tax Reform; VII. Sensitivity Analysis; VII. Conclusions; Appendix; References"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This paper focuses on the macroeconomic and budgetary impact of tax reforms in a New Keynesian two-country model. Our results show that both income and consumption unilateral tax rate reductions do not constitute a \"free lunch\", in the sense that they have negative budgetary consequences for the country which implements them. In addition, the degree of self-financing implied by our model is in the 8½-24 percent range. Since the degree of self-financing estimated in previous literature was larger, we conclude that in our model not only the \"lunch\" is not \"free\", but is also not that \"cheap\". A comparison of alternative (income-tax versus consumption-tax based) fiscal stimulus packages shows that consumption tax cuts imply a larger short-run impact on domestic output but the income tax cuts stimulate the domestic economy more in the long run. We also look at the implications of a revenue-neutral tax reform in which consumption taxes are increased to compensate for lower income tax collection."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISALENTO991001638269707536"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"I comuni della provincia di Lecce : compendio economico-statistico/ a cura del Servizio di statistica - Studi della Camera di commercio di Lecce"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Lecce : CCIAA"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"v. : ill. ; 30 cm"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"330.945753"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Lecce <prov.> - Statistiche"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Economia - Lecce - Statistiche"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Anno 2007. - [Lecce] : CCIAA, stampa 2007. - 315 p."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Anno 2008. - Lecce : CCIAA, 2009. - 308 p"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Anno 2010. - Lecce : CCIAA, 2010. - 309 p"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Anno 2011. - Lecce : CCIAA, 2011. - 352 p"]
[{"$nulls":4},"[Anno] 2012. - Lecce : CCIAA, 2012. - 354 p"]
[{"$nulls":4},"[Anno] 2013. - Lecce : CCIAA, 2013. - 354 p"]
[{"$nulls":4},"[Anno] 2014. - Lecce : CCIAA, 2014. - 323 p"]