{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[10,2,10,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[17,2,17,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910787125203321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Republicanism in Northeast Asia / / edited by Jun-Hyeok Kwak and Leigh Jenco"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, N.Y. : , : Routledge, , 2015"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-315-79742-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-317-75350-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (211 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Political Theories in East Asian Context"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"PHI019000POL010000SOC008000"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"321.8/6095"]
[{"$nulls":4},"321.86095"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Republicanism - East Asia"]
[{"$nulls":4},"East Asia Politics and government 21st century"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Half Title; Title Page; Copyright Page; Table ofContents; List of contributors; Introduction: Republicanism in the Northeast Asian context; Chapter summaries; Conclusion; Bibliography; Part I:Republicanism and political theory; 2.Republicanism across cultures; Introduction; Basic functioning capability; The structural character of freedom as non-domination; The universal appeal of this structural ideal; Conclusion; Acknowledgements; Notes; Bibliography; 3.Non-domination and 'shame' culture: reconsidering criminal punishment in republicanism ; Introduction"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Theoretical overview: reintegrative shaming'Shame' in the Northeast Asian context; Non-domination and public shaming; Conclusion; Notes; Bibliography; 4.Non-domination, civic virtue and contestatory politics; Introduction; Obstacles to community in non-domination: self-assertion and contention?; Civility, civic virtue and solidarity; Politics: contestatory or contentious?; Conclusion: community and contestation; Notes; Bibliography; 5.Republicanism, relational equality and global justice; Relational theories of equality; Republicanism: a relational theory of equality"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Relational equality and republican global justiceAcknowledgement; Notes; Bibliography; Part II:The emergence and historical appropriation of republicanism; 6.What is 'republican' about republican Chinese thought (1895-1949)? ; Visions of republicanism in republican China; The literatus posture; Republicanism during May Fourth and under "]
[{"$nulls":4},"communism; The people as rulers (zhu), or as literati (shi)?; Conclusion: tensions of the literatus posture; Notes; Bibliography; 7.'Public discussion' and Confucianism in 19th-century Japan ; The concept of 'public discussion' in Japanese neo-Confucianism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"The political philosophy of Yokoi Shonan and the problem in modern Japanese politicsBibliography; 8. The distinctiveness of republicanism in modern Korea: ideas andconstitutions; Introduction: ideals and realities of republicanism in Korea; The perception of state and republic in the 'historic state'; The rise of modern republican thought in the late 19th century; The Korean republican movement under Japanese colonial rule; A form of republican government: mixed government; A substance of republican government: mixed economy and equality; Concluding remarks; Notes; Bibliography"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Part III:The place of republicanism in contemporary Northeast Asia9.Republican beginnings: liberty as non-domination in the Chineserepublicanist tradition; 1; 2; 3; 4; Acknowledgement; Notes; Bibliography; 10.Patriotism and republicanism in Japan: a century ago and today; Republicanism and patriotism in contemporary Japan; Critical patriotism in Japan: a century ago; Conclusion; Notes; Bibliography; 11.Republicanism, freedom of speech and the Korean Public Officials Election Act; Introduction; 1; 2; 3; Conclusion; Notes; Bibliography; Index by name; Index by subject"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"As rapid economic development brings increasing uncertainty in East Asia, interest in a new version of republicanism, termed is neo-Roman republicanism, is growing across the region. Conceptualized as liberty as non-domination, this new form of republicanism has inspired not only Western but also East Asian political theorists. However, neo-Roman republican ideas in Northeast Asian countries continue to face serious conceptual and political challenges, which scholarly literature on both republicanism and on East Asian politics has largely failed to confront. This book addresses these challenges by surveying the latest theoretical contributions to the studies of republicanism in Western countries and the latest interpretations of how republicanism, including both communitarian republicanism and neo-Roman republicanism, has been appropriated in countries in East Asia. In particular, it deals with the key question of whether liberty as non-domination can work in non-Western contexts where the fundamental tenets of liberal democracy such as moral individualism and value pluralism, do not predominate. Across three sections, the chapters first provide a conceptual overview of republicanism as a global political theory, they then consider how republicanism has historically been received, resisted, and translated into East Asia, and finally, examine how historically informed possibilities fit with the emergent needs of contemporary Northeast Asian societies\"--"]