{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[10,2,10,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[17,2,17,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910785813003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Bennis Hans"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Gaps and dummies  / / Hans Bennis"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Dordrecht : , : Foris Publications, , 1986"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-11-088953-6"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[Reprint 2010]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (352 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Linguistic Models ; ; 9"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"410"]
[{"$nulls":4},"435"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Dutch language - Syntax"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Grammar, Comparative and general - Syntax"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Front matter -- Introduction -- 1. Gaps and Parasitic Gaps -- 2. Het as a referential expression -- 3. The adverbial pronoun er -- 4. Some related topics -- References"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In this study the syntactic properties of empty categories and dummy pronouns are investigated within the framework of Government-Binding theory.  The assumption that clauses must have a subject is present in most, if not all, linguistic theories. In GB theory the requirement that clauses have a subject is stipulated as a consequence of the base rules or the Extended Projection Principle. In this book it is claimed that no such stipulation is necessary. The presence of a subject is exclusively determined by the theories of thematic roles and Case."]