{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":19,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910785165803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Edlin Douglas E"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Judges and unjust laws [[electronic resource] ] : common law constitutionalism and the foundations of judicial review / / Douglas E. Edlin"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Ann Arbor, : University of Michigan Press, c2008"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-282-69754-4"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612697548"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-472-02295-4"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (336 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"347/.012"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Judge-made law - Great Britain"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Judge-made law - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Judicial review - Great Britain"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Judicial review - United States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 283-299) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"The common law -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to apply the law -- The conceptual argument for the judicial obligation to apply the law -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law : part I (England) -- The source-based argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law : part II (United States) -- The conceptual argument for the judicial obligation to develop the law -- Common law review -- Common law review in two common law systems."]