{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":56,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":56,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[12,2,12,3],[12,4,12,5],[13,2,13,3],[13,4,13,5],[14,2,14,3],[14,4,14,5],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,17,3],[18,2,18,3],[19,2,19,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[33,2,33,3],[33,4,33,5],[34,2,34,3],[34,4,34,5],[35,2,35,3],[35,4,35,5],[36,2,36,3],[37,2,37,3],[45,2,45,3],[46,2,46,3],[47,2,47,3],[49,2,49,3],[50,2,50,3],[54,2,54,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA990000247900403321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"ADAPTIVE methods for control system design / edited by Madan M. Gupta ; Associate editor Chi-Hau Chen"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York : IEEE Press, copyr. 1986"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-87942-207-6"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"XXII, 461 p. ill. 29 cm"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"629.8"]
[null,null,"Locazione",null,"DINAE"]
[null,null,"Collocazione",null,"09 050-017"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","scheda di prova"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910795616503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Adamson Peter <1946->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Don't Think for Yourself : Authority and Belief in Medieval Philosophy / / Peter Adamson"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Notre Dame, Indiana : , : University of Notre Dame Press, , [2022]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2022"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-268-20338-5"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[First edition.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (195 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Conway Lectures in Medieval Studies"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"181.9"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Philosophy, Medieval"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Philosophy, Medieval - Islamic influences"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Authority - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Intellectual freedom"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reason"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Includes index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","How do we judge whether we should be willing to follow the views of experts or whether we ought to try to come to our own, independent views? This book seeks the answer in medieval philosophical thought. In this engaging study into the history of philosophy and epistemology, Peter Adamson provides an answer to a question as relevant today as it was in the medieval period: how and when should we turn to the authoritative expertise of other people in forming our own beliefs? He challenges us to reconsider our approach to this question through a constructive recovery of the intellectual and cultural traditions of the Islamic world, the Byzantine Empire, and Latin Christendom. Adamson begins by foregrounding the distinction in Islamic philosophy between taqld, or the uncritical acceptance of authority, and ijtihd, or judgment based on independent effort, the latter of which was particularly prized in Islamic law, theology, and philosophy during the medieval period. He then demonstrates how the Islamic tradition paves the way for the development of what he calls a \"justified taqld,\" according to which one develops the skills necessary to critically and selectively follow an authority based on their reliability. The book proceeds to reconfigure our understanding of the relation between authority and independent thought in the medieval world by illuminating how women found "]
[{"$nulls":4},"spaces to assert their own intellectual authority, how medieval writers evaluated the authoritative status of Plato and Aristotle, and how independent reasoning was deployed to defend one Abrahamic faith against the other. This clear and eloquently written book will interest scholars in and enthusiasts of medieval philosophy, Islamic studies, Byzantine studies, and the history of thought."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910783006503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Keuzenkamp Hugo A."]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Probability, econometrics and truth : the methodology of econometrics / / Hugo A. Keuzenkamp [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cambridge : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2000"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-107-11285-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-280-15196-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-11632-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-01579-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-15602-2"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-32902-4"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-49330-4"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-511-05330-4"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (ix, 312 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"330/.01/5195"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Econometrics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Probabilities"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015)."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 281-298) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"The philosophy of induction -- Probability and indifference -- Intermezzo: a formal scheme of reference."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","When John Maynard Keynes likened Jan Tinbergen's early work in econometrics to black magic and alchemy, he was expressing a widely held view of a new discipline. However, even after half a century of practical work and theorizing by some of the most accomplished social scientists, Keynes' comments are still repeated today. This book assesses the foundations and development of econometrics and sets out a basis for the reconstruction of the foundations of econometric inference by examining the various interpretations of probability theory which underlie econometrics. Keuzenkamp claims that the probabilistic foundations of econometrics are weak, and although econometric inferences may yield interesting knowledge, claims to be able to falsify or verify economic theories are unwarranted. Methodological falsificationism in econometrics is an illusion. Instead, it is argued, econometrics should locate itself in the tradition of positivism."]