{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":23,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":23,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[20,2,20,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910782725903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Zuckert Michael P. <1942->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Natural rights and the new republicanism / / Michael P. Zuckert"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Princeton, N.J., : Princeton University Press, 1994"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4008-0901-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4008-1399-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-283-13327-X"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613133274"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4008-2152-5"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[Course Book]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (418 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"323/.01"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Natural law"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Republicanism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Political science - History - 17th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Political science - History - 18th century"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [377]-390) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Prologue -- Part I: Protestants -- Chapter 1. Aristotelian Royalism and Reformation Absolutism: Divine Right Theory -- Chapter 2. Aristotelian Constitutionalism and Reformation Contractarianism: From Ancient Constitution to Original Contract -- Chapter 3. Contract and Christian Liberty: John Milton -- Part II: Whigs -- Chapter 4. Whig Contractarianisms and Rights -- Chapter 5. The Master of Whig Political Philosophy -- Chapter 6. A Neo-Harringtonian Moment? Whig Political Science and the Old Republicanism -- Part III: Natural Rights and the New Republicanism -- Chapter 7. Locke and the Reformation of Natural Law: Questions Concerning the Law of Nature -- Chapter 8. Locke and the Reformation of Natural Law: Two Treatises of Government -- Chapter 9. Locke and the Reformation of Natural Law: Of Property -- Chapter 10. Locke and the Transformation of Whig Political Philosophy -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In Natural Rights and the New Republicanism, Michael Zuckert proposes a new view of the political philosophy that lay behind the founding of the United States. In a book that will interest political scientists, historians, and philosophers, Zuckert looks at the Whig or opposition "]
[{"$nulls":4},"tradition as it developed in England. He argues that there were, in fact, three opposition traditions: Protestant, Grotian, and Lockean. Before the English Civil War the opposition was inspired by the effort to find the \"one true Protestant politics--an effort that was seen to be a failure by the end of the Interregnum period. The Restoration saw the emergence of the Whigs, who sought a way to ground politics free from the sectarian theological-scriptural conflicts of the previous period. The Whigs were particularly influenced by the Dutch natural law philosopher Hugo Grotius. However, as Zuckert shows, by the mid-eighteenth century John Locke had replaced Grotius as the philosopher of the Whigs. Zuckert's analysis concludes with a penetrating examination of John Trenchard and Thomas Gordon, the English \"Cato,\" who, he argues, brought together Lockean political philosophy and pre-existing Whig political science into a new and powerful synthesis. Although it has been misleadingly presented as a separate \"classical republican\" tradition in recent scholarly discussions, it is this \"new republicanism\" that served as the philosophical point of departure for the founders of the American republic."]