{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":36,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":36,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3],[21,2,21,3],[21,4,21,5],[22,2,22,3],[22,4,22,5],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[32,2,32,3],[33,2,33,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910781539903321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Anger Suzy"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Victorian interpretation [[electronic resource] /] / Suzy Anger"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Ithaca, NY, : Cornell University Press, 2005"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-8014-6485-4"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-8014-6479-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (221 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"121/.686/094209034"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Interpretation (Philosophy) - History - 19th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Hermeneutics - History - 19th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"English literature - 19th century - History and criticism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Philosophy, English - 19th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Great Britain Intellectual life 19th century"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. 173-197) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgments -- An Overview -- 1. Victorian Scriptural Hermeneutics: History, Intention, and Evolution -- 2. Carlyle: Between Biblical Exegesis and Romantic Hermeneutics -- 3. George Eliot's Hermeneutics of Sympathy -- 4. Subjectivism, Intersubjectivity, and Intention: Oscar Wilde and Literary Hermeneutics -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Suzy Anger investigates the relationship of Victorian interpretation to the ways in which literary criticism is practiced today. Her primary focus is literary interpretation, but she also considers fields such as legal theory, psychology, history, and the natural sciences in order to establish the pervasiveness of hermeneutic thought in Victorian culture. Anger's book demonstrates that much current thought on interpretation has its antecedents in the Victorians, who were already deeply engaged with the problems of interpretation that concern literary theorists today.Anger traces the development and transformation of interpretive theory from a religious to a secular (and particularly literary) context. She argues that even as hermeneutic theory was secularized in literary interpretation it carried in its practice some of the religious implications with which the tradition began. She further maintains that, for the Victorians, theories of interpretation are often connected to ethical principles and suggests that all theories of interpretation may ultimately be grounded in ethical theories.Beginning "]
[{"$nulls":4},"with an examination of Victorian biblical exegesis, in the work of figures such as Benjamin Jowett, John Henry Newman, and Matthew Arnold, the book moves to studies of Thomas Carlyle, George Eliot, and Oscar Wilde. Emphasizing the extent to which these important writers are preoccupied with hermeneutics, Anger also shows that consideration of their thought brings to light questions and qualifications of some of the assumptions of contemporary criticism."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910495759803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Benoit Eric"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Apories, paradoxes et autocontradictions : La littérature de l’impossible / / Éric Benoit"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Pessac, : Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2018"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"979-1-03-000388-8"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (343 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Modernités"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Literary Theory &amp; Criticism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"aporie"]
[{"$nulls":4},"contradiction"]
[{"$nulls":4},"possibilité"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","La littérature moderne montre souvent une propension de l’écriture à se confronter à sa propre impossibilité, voire à s’en nourrir, paradoxalement. Ce paradoxe est difficilement théorisable ou conceptualisable, il échappe essentiellement à la saisie conceptuelle et à la logique classique, mais il est cependant l’objet d’une expérience littéraire récurrente, historiquement repérable, objectivement observable dans les textes, et donc descriptible, ou appréhendable comme une sorte d’algorithme de certaines tendances de l’écriture littéraire (non tant dans son contenu que dans son mode de fonctionnement) : comment continuer à écrire jusque dans l’aporie, comment frayer dans l’impasse (aporia) les chemins de l’écriture ?  Cette prédilection de l’écriture pour une situation auto-contradictoire a été relevée par Roland Barthes disant que « la modernité commence avec la recherche d’une Littérature impossible ». C’est sur ce paradoxe que portera ici notre réflexion, pour essayer d’en dégager les origines, pour tenter d’en explorer les modalités et les modulations. La littérature en effet tend non seulement à se réfléchir elle-même, mais aussi à réfléchir sa propre impossibilité, à faire œuvre de son impossibilité (à faire œuvre de son propre « désœuvrement », pour reprendre le terme de Blanchot), jusqu’à assumer voire revendiquer sa propre impossibilité comme étant son essence même."]