{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":20,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":20,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[17,2,17,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910781367303321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Thomas-Fogiel Isabelle"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The death of philosophy [[electronic resource] ] : reference and self-reference in contemporary thought / / Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel ; translated by Richard A. Lynch"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, : Columbia University Press, c2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-281-60501-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613785701"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-231-51963-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (359 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"190.9/051"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Philosophy, French - 21st century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Philosophy, Modern - 21st century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reference (Philosophy)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"pt. 1. The end of philosophy, or the paradoxes of speaking -- pt. 2. Challenging the \"death of philosophy\" : the reflexive a priori -- pt. 3. The end of philosophy in perspective : the source of the reflexive deficit."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Philosophers debate the death of philosophy as much as they debate the death of God. Kant claimed responsibility for both philosophy's beginning and end, while Heidegger argued it concluded with Nietzsche. In the twentieth century, figures as diverse as John Austin and Richard Rorty have proclaimed philosophy's end, with some even calling for the advent of \"postphilosophy.\" In an effort to make sense of these conflicting positions\u0097which often say as much about the philosopher as his subject\u0097Isabelle Thomas-Fogiel undertakes the first systematic treatment of \"the end of philosophy,\" while also recasting the history of western thought itself.Thomas-Fogiel begins with postphilosophical claims such as scientism, which she reveals to be self-refuting, for they subsume philosophy into the branches of the natural sciences. She discovers similar issues in Rorty's skepticism and strands of continental thought. Revisiting the work of late-nineteenth and early-twentieth-century philosophers, when the split between analytical and continental philosophy began, Thomas-Fogiel finds both traditions followed the same path\u0097the road of reference\u0097which "]
[{"$nulls":4},"ultimately led to self-contradiction. This phenomenon, whether valorized or condemned, has been understood as the death of philosophy. Tracing this pattern from Quine to Rorty, from Heidegger to Levinas and Habermas, Thomas-Fogiel reveals the self-contradiction at the core of their claims while also carving an alternative path through self-reference. Trained under the French philosopher Bernard Bourgeois, she remakes philosophy in exciting new ways for the twenty-first century."]