{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[20,2,20,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910780576803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Roush Sherry"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Hermes' lyre : Italian poetic self-commentary from Dante to Tommasco Campanella / / Sherry Roush"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Toronto, [Ontario] ; ; Buffalo, [New York] ; ; London, [England] : , : University of Toronto Press, , 2002"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2002"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-282-02317-9"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612023170"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4426-7571-3"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (260 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Toronto Italian Studies"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"851.009"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Italian poetry - History and criticism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Hermeneutics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Criticism, interpretation, etc."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"CONTENTS -- PREFACE: THE LYRE OF HERMES -- INTRODUCTION. Beyond Explication: Poets and Their Own Commentaries -- Part One. Dante and Boccaccio: The Emergence of Italian Poetic Self-Commentary -- 1 'You might call it something of a commentary': Defining Terms in Dante's Vita Nuova and Convivio -- 2 'Only the ploughshare aided by many clever talents cleaves the soil of poetry': Boccaccio's Earthly Vision of the Text and the Requisites for its Interpretation -- Part Two. Poetic Self-Commentary Reborn in Quattrocento Florence"]
[{"$nulls":4},"3 'Know thyself': Self-knowledge and New Life in Lorenzo de' Medici's Commentary on My Sonnets4 'Distorted in contrary senses': Girolamo Benivieni's Self-Commentative Reformation -- Part Three. Poetic Self-Commentary at the End of the Renaissance -- 5 'It is neither formed nor form': Reading Beyond the Lines of Bruno's Dialogic Self-Commentary, the Heroic Frenzies -- 6 'Did we not prophesy in Your name?': Settimontano Squilla as the Apocalyptic Seventh Trumpet in Tommaso Campanella's Vatic Project -- 7 Invocation, Interpretation, Inspiration -- NOTES -- BIBLIOGRAPHY"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Indexa -- b -- c -- d -- e -- f -- g -- h -- i -- j -- k -- l -- m -- n -- o -- p -- q -- r -- s -- t -- u -- v -- w -- y -- z"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","From the mysterious glosses by 'EK' in the poetry of Edmund Spenser, to the self-commentary in Vladimir Nabokov's Pale Fire, readers of literature have been fascinated by the comments, addenda, and footnotes added by authors to their own work. In this insightful and original work, Sherry Roush investigates poets' motivations for writing glosses. She argues that self-commentary differs fundamentally from standard commentary, and that it does not necessarily impose an authoritative reading, determine the poem's significance, or furnish factual autobiographical information. Rather, self-commentary presents an intriguing ulterior poetic dimension and adds to the inherent tension of the text. Roush focuses her study on three pairs of authors, each representing a distinct historical-contextual period: Dante and Boccaccio in the early Italian self-commentative tradition, Lorenzo de' Medici and Girolamo Benivieni in high Renaissance Florence, and Giordano Bruno and Tommaso Campanella at the turn of the seventeenth century. Through numerous examples, Roush highlights the non-linear development of this mixed genre, and shows how poetic self-commentaries respond to unique literary, historical, and political exigencies, and offer keys to understanding the underlying poetic message. This seminal study will be of particular value to scholars interested in poetry, hermeneutics, autobiography, and Renaissance studies."]