{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":12,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":12,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910725015503321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Caron-Laviolette Elisa"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Biais, hiatus et absences en archéologie : [actes de la 12e journée doctorale d'archéologie, Paris, 17 mai 2017] / / Elisa Caron-Laviolette [and three others]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Paris : , : Éditions de la Sorbonne, , 2019"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"930.1"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Archaeology"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","L'archéologie est communément distinguée des autres sciences humaines, en particulier des sciences du passé, par son objet d'étude qui est, par essence, l'homme à travers les vestiges matériels, de l'objet jusqu'au site archéologique et son environnement. Mais alors que ces restes tangibles des sociétés passées sont descriptibles, caractérisables, classables dans des typologies, comment aborder et interpréter les vides et les silences documentaires qui n'ont pas laissé de traces manifestes ? La problématique de l'absence est commune à toutes les approches archéologiques et à toutes les aires chronoculturelles. Dans les articles de ce volume, issus de communications présentées lors de la 12e Journée Doctorale d'archéologie de l'université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (ED 112), les doctorants tentent, à travers des indices indirects, de définir, de mesurer, d'expliquer ces vides et ces silences, voire de les combler. Face à la nature incomplète ou biaisée des sources archéologiques, des solutions méthodologiques sont proposées et appliquées à des problématiques et à des contextes variés, à la faveur d'approches croisées, multidimensionnelles et multiscalaires. Archaeology is usually distinguished from other human sciences (especially these concerning the past) on behalf of its subject: man through material remains, from the scale of a single object to that of the archaeological site and its environment. But while these tangible remains of past societies are describable, characterizable and able to be classified in typologies, we are left to wonder: how do we address and interpret voids and "]
[{"$nulls":4},"documentary silences that did not leave any patent trace? The problematics of absence is a shared concern among all archaeological approaches and all time periods. In this volume's papers, issued from oral presentations held during the 12th Journée Doctorale d'archéologie of the Paris Panthéon Sorbonne University (ED 112), PhD candidates attempt, through indirect clues, to define."]