{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":18,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":18,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910717370203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Shekelle Paul G."]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Maintaining research integrity : a systematic review of the role of the institutional review board in managing conflict of interest / / investigators, Paul G. Shekelle [and four others]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Washington, DC : , : Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service, , [2012]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2012"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (iv, 53 pages) : illustrations"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Evidence-based Synthesis Program"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"342.0684"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Conflict of interests"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Technical reports."]
[{"$nulls":4},"United States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","\"Evidence-based synthesis program.\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"May 2012.\""]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Ethical integrity in the conduct of health care research is essential for maintaining the public trust and support of such activities. Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) play a critical role in maintaining the ethical integrity of research by reviewing research protocols to ensure, among other things, that research participants receive safe and ethical treatment and provide informed consent, and that the potential for a conflict of interest is minimized. The purpose of this review was to catalog the literature on issues pertaining to IRBs, to identify the issue with the greatest number of published studies which might inform VA policy, and to assess the evidence regarding that issue, which were conflict of interest policies and the activities of the IRB."]