{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":14,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":14,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[13,2,13,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910696936503321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Homeland defense [[electronic resource] ] : planning, resourcing, and training issues challenge DOD's response to domestic chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and high-yield explosive incidents : report to Congressional requesters"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"[Washington, D.C.] : , : U.S. Govt. Accountability Office, , [2009]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (ii, 59 pages) : illustrations"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Emergency management - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Interagency coordination - United States"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Title from PDF title page (GAO, viewed October 13, 2009)."]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"October 2009.\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"GAO-10-123.\""]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Results in brief -- Background -- DOD has its own CBRNE consequence management plans in place but is unable to fully integrate them with other federal plans, which are incomplete -- DOD's planned response to CBRNE incidents may be insufficient -- DOD has taken actions to improve CCMRF readiness, but training gaps and conflicting priorities may degrade performance -- CCMRF requirements have not been fully developed, and funding and oversight are decentralized -- Conclusions."]