{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910688236403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Sadek Maria Tereza Aina"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"O judiciário em debate / / Maria Tereza Sadek (organiser)"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"SciELO Books - Centro Edelstein, 2010"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Rio de Janeiro : , : Centro Edelstein, , 2010"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9788579820342 (ebook)"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (62 pages) : digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Biblioteca Virtual de Ciências Humanas"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Judicial power - Brazil"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Courts - Brazil"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Justice, Administration of - Brazil"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Portoghese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Bibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The research was carried out in the second half of 1993 by a team coordinated by Maria Tereza Sadek and integrated by Rogério Bastos Arantes, Maria da Glória Bonelli, Gessé Marques Jr. and Fábio José Kerche Nunes. About 20% of the judges were interviewed in five states - São Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Paraná, Goiás and Pernambuco - and another 41 from the Federal Court, totaling 570 interviews, observing strict proportionality in relation to their distribution among the judges. existing instances and entrances in each state. The choice of those five states aimed to represent the country's regional diversity and possible singularities in the composition or performance of the judiciary."]