{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":3,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":42,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":42,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[10,2,10,3],[10,4,10,5],[11,2,11,3],[11,4,11,5],[12,2,12,3],[12,4,12,5],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[18,2,18,3],[20,2,20,3],[22,2,22,3],[22,4,22,5],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[24,4,24,5],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[29,2,29,3],[30,2,30,3],[31,2,31,3],[32,2,32,3],[33,2,33,3],[34,2,34,3],[35,2,35,3],[39,2,39,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA990002729020203316"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"VANDROMME, Pol"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"François Nourissier : portrait-verité / Pol Vandromme"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Paris : La table Ronde, [copyr. 1993]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"242 p. ; 20 cm"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"843"]
[null,null,"Collocazione",null,"XV.4.B. 21"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910627231003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Fernow Richard Clinton"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Principles of Magnetostatics / / Richard Clinton Fernow"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cambridge, England : , : Cambridge University Press, , 2017"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (300 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"539.7"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Nuclear physics"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Preface; 1. Basic concepts; 2. Magnetic materials; 3. Potential theory; 4. Conductor-dominant transverse fields; 5. Complex analysis of transverse fields; 6. Iron-dominant transverse fields; 7. Axial field configurations; 8. Periodic magnetic channels; 9. Permanent magnets; 10. Time-varying fields; 11. Numerical methods; Appendices: A. Symbols and SI units; B. Vector analysis; C. Bessel functions; D. Legendre functions; E. Complex variable analysis; F. Complete elliptic integrals; Index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Magnetostatics, the mathematical theory that describes the forces and fields resulting from the steady flow of electrical currents, has a long history. By capturing the basic concepts, and building towards the computation of magnetic fields, this book is a self-contained discussion of the major subjects in magnetostatics. Overviews of Maxwell's equations, the Poisson equation, and boundary value problems pave the way for dealing with fields from transverse, axial and periodic magnetic arrangements and assemblies of permanent magnets. Examples from accelerator and beam physics give up-to-date context to the theory. Both complex contour integration and numerical techniques for calculating magnetic fields are discussed in detail with plentiful examples. Theoretical and practical information on carefully selected topics make this a one-stop reference for magnet designers, as well as for physics and electrical engineering undergraduate students. This title, first published in 2016, has been reissued as an Open Access publication."]
[null,"3.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910781478203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Knight Jack <1952->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The priority of democracy [[electronic resource] ] : political consequences of pragmatism / / Jack Knight and James Johnson"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Princeton [N.J.], : Princeton University Press, c2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-283-15256-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613152565"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4008-4033-3"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[Course Book]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (343 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"A Princeton University Press e-book"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"321.8"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Democracy - Philosophy"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Preliminaries -- Pragmatism and the problem of institutional design -- The appeal of decentralization -- The priority of democracy and the burden of justification -- Reconsidering the role of political argument in democratic politics -- Refining reflexivity -- Formal conditions : institutionalizing liberal guarantees -- Substantive conditions : pragmatism and effectiveness."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Pragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions. What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is that not all decisions should be made democratically. So, for example, the democratically elected U.S. Congress may legitimately remove monetary policy from democratic decision-making by putting it under the control of the Federal Reserve. Knight and Johnson argue that "]
[{"$nulls":4},"pragmatism offers an original and compelling justification of democracy in terms of the unique contributions democratic institutions can make to processes of institutional choice. This focus highlights the important role that democracy plays, not in achieving consensus or commonality, but rather in addressing conflicts. Indeed, Knight and Johnson suggest that democratic politics is perhaps best seen less as a way of reaching consensus or agreement than as a way of structuring the terms of persistent disagreement."]