{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":38,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":38,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[19,4,19,5],[20,2,20,3],[20,4,20,5],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[30,2,30,3],[31,2,31,3],[35,2,35,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910597165203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Platon"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"L’Euthyphron de Platon : Philosophie et religion / / Platon"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Paris, : Vrin, 2021"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"2-345-00171-2"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (320 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Tradition de la pensée classique"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Classics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"philosophie"]
[{"$nulls":4},"religion"]
[{"$nulls":4},"dialogue"]
[{"$nulls":4},"eidétique"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","L’Euthyphron appartient à l’histoire de la philosophie, mais il a aussi une place particulière dans l’histoire de la philosophie de la religion. Avec ce Dialogue, la religion se constitue comme problème philosophique en même temps que la philosophie constitue son mode propre de questionnement. L’interrogation sur la piété, en effet, est menée du point de vue de ce qu’il en est de son Idée, ce qui conduit à déprécier la forme de vie religieuse que représente l’eusebeia et généralement toutes celles qui ne sont pas capables de se justifier.  Mais cette recherche qui porte sur la piété comme Idée n’est pas seulement un des premiers exemples, dans l’œuvre de Platon, de recherche eidétique. Parce que la philosophie se découvre en un sens originairement pieuse (comme mouvement de recherche d’un principe où l’Idée et la Valeur tendent à s’identifier), la vraie piété nous apprend, à sa manière, ce qu’est la vraie philosophie. D’où le caractère ambigu des rapports entre philosophie et religion, faits de mise à distance critique et de proximité compréhensive. La possibilité de tenir ensemble ces deux dimensions est sans doute le problème le plus fondamental de la philosophie de la religion, mais la plupart des philosophies optent pour l’une ou l’autre de façon tranchée.  Une des caractéristiques de l’Euthyphron est de maintenir les deux aspects : d’"]
[{"$nulls":4},"une part, une philosophie critique de la religion comprise comme eusebeia (piété dévote), d’autre part, une philosophie religieuse, entendue comme pensée de l’hosiotès (d’un juste sentiment du divin, d’une vraie piété)."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910822319103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Crowder George"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Liberalism and value pluralism / / George Crowder"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"London ; ; New York : , : Continuum, , 2002"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4411-8807-X"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (289 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Political theory and contemporary politics"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"320.51"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Liberalism - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Liberalism - Moral and ethical aspects"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Social values"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Pluralism"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (pages 263-273) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Cover; Contents; Preface and Acknowledgements; 1 Introduction; Part I: Liberalism and Value Pluralism; 2 Liberalism and its Justification; 3 Value Pluralism; Part II: Pluralist Arguments: Liberal and Anti-Liberal; 4 From Pluralism to Anti-Utopianism: Berlin''s Case; 5 Pluralism against Liberalism? Conservatism and Pragmatism; Part III: From Pluralism to Liberalism; 6 From Pluralism to Liberalism I: Diversity; 7 From Pluralism to Liberalism II: Reasonable Disagreement; 8 From Pluralism to Liberalism III: Virtues; 9 Pluralist Liberalism; 10 Conclusion; References; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H"]
[{"$nulls":4},"IJ; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W; Y"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Value pluralism is the idea, associated with the late Isaiah Berlin, that fundamental human values are irreducibly plural and incommensurable. Ends like liberty, equality and community are intrinsic goods which can neither be ranked in an absolute hierarchy nor translated into units of a common denominator. If that is true, how can we choose among such values when they come into conflict in particular cases? In particular, what reason is there to justify the value ranking characteristic of liberal democracy, favouring personal autonomy and toleration? Recent commentators have seen value plural"]