{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":16,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":16,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[13,2,13,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910580223603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Rittman Martyn"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Judging Research"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Basel : , : MDPI AG, , 2020"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2020"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-03928-315-4"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 electronic resource (64 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"The MDPI Writing Prize Series"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Society & culture: general"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Intro -- The MDPI Writing Prize Series Volume 2 -- Contents -- List of Contributors -- About the Series Editor -- Preface to \"Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded?\" -- Incentives, Rewards, and Recognition - What Really Motivates a Researcher? -- How to Evaluate and Reward Science and Technology Researchers -- Scientific Metrics: How Useful Are They? -- Tangible and Non-Tangible Rewards- a Balancing Act -- Judging and Rewarding Research and Researchers: Beyond Bibliometrics -- Judging Research in the Doors of Irreproducibility Crisis Era -- Should the Quality of the Journal Determine the Quality of the Research? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded? -- Open Science, Sustainability and Qualitative Assessment of Merit for an Objective Evaluation of Research -- Impact Factor ≠ Impact: Lessons Learned from Research Evaluation -- Moving Beyond Metrics -- Mathematics in Current Science and in Scientific Evaluation -- Achievement of the Paper and Its Honor for a Researcher -- Judging Research: Is There Even a Need of Evaluating the Research? -- Research Quality and How to Find It? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded? -- Judging Research: How Should Research and Researchers Be Evaluated and Rewarded?."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","The 2019 MPDI Writing Prize invited early stage researchers who are not native English speakers to write on the subject of \"how research should be evaluated and how researchers should be rewarded\". Six prizes were awarded, however there were many more entries. This book collates many of those entries and contains inspiring, thought-"]
[{"$nulls":4},"provoking and original viewpoints of open science through the eyes of those conducting research on a daily basis."]