{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":41,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":41,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[20,2,20,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[25,2,25,3],[35,2,35,3],[36,2,36,3],[38,2,38,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910563177403321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Gianvittorio Laura"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Il discorso di Eraclito : un modello semantico e cosmologico nel passaggio dall' oralità alla scrittura / / Laura Gianvittrio"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Zurich, Switzerland ; ; New York : , : Georg Olms Verlag Hildesheim, , 2010"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2014"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (xviii, 287 pages) : illustrations; digital, PDF file(s)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Spudasmata ; ; 134"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"182.4"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Pre-Socratic philosophers"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Italiano"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Since the “scuola urbinate” (e. g. B. Gentili) applied the oral theory to the Greek lyricists, orality is seen to have influenced thought and language not only of rhapsodists, but of archaic authors in general. Against this background, I investigate how the interaction between orality and literacy, which I suggest to call “aurality”, influences the semantics and the linguistic reasoning chiefly of Heraclitus among the early presocratic thinkers. On the one hand Heraclitus is an oral “image-thinker” (Havelock) and his prose is poetically constructed; on the other hand only by writing he can figure out the discourse (λόγος) as a ὀνόματα-composed unity, as I mean he does, rather than holistic or as a continuum, what is common in oral societies. Such a λόγος is able to serve as a cosmological model, for the physical world consisting of a multiplicity of phenomena closely jointed to each other into an invisible unity."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Im allgemeinen Verständnis begründen die Vorsokratiker das philosophische Fachwissen und die philosophische Fachsprache. Diese Annahme wird in der vorliegenden Arbeit mittels einer semantischen Analyse revidiert: die Sprache der Vorsokratiker meidet nicht, sondern zielt geradezu auf mehrdeutige und redundante Ausdrucksweisen. Hier ist der nicht-terminologische Gebrauch von logos bei Heraklit besonders aufschlussreich. In der Bedeutung dieses Lexems, die an den bis zur Zeit des Ephesiers belegten Verwendungskontexten untersucht wird, zeigt sich die noch wirkende Kontinuität mit der legein- Grundbedeutung „sammeln“: die „Rede“ besteht nämlich aus einer "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Sammlung einzelner epea bzw. onomata. Aufgrund ihrer synthetischen Struktur ist sie geeignet, eine heuristische Funktion für das menschliche Verstehen der latenten Einheit scheinbar loser Erscheinungen zu erfüllen. Sowohl formal, in der Art, wie das Lexem semantisch aufgeladen wird, als auch inhaltlich, in der spezifi sch herakliteischen Interdependenz zwischen Realität und Sprache, lassen sich in dem logos des Heraklit Charakteristika erkennen, die auf den Übergang von der Mündlichkeit zur Schriftlichkeit zurückgeführt werden können.Secondo la communis opinio, i Presocratici segnano l’inizio della filosofi a come disciplina e del relativo linguaggio specialistico. Tali presupposti vengono qui messi in discussione in base ad un’analisi semantica del linguaggio presocratico: piuttosto che ridurre, esso potenzia ambiguità e ridondanza sfruttandole come risorse del senso. L’esame si concentra sull’uso non terminologico di logos in Eraclito. Il signifi cato del lessema, stabilito in base ai contesti d’uso attestati fi no all’epoca dell’Efesio ed affrancato dalla successiva Wirkungsgeschichte, è ancora contraddistinto dall’idea del ‘raccogliere insieme’ (legein): il ‘discorso’, infatti, consiste nella sintesi di singoli epea (detti) ed onomata (nomi). Mostrando il farsi uno dei molti, il logos assume dunque una funzione euristica per la comprensione dell’unità di fenomeni apparentemente irrelati o contraddittori. Sia a livello formale, nei modi della “ri-semantizzazione” della parola- chiave, sia a livello contenutistico, nella specifi ca interdipendenza scorta tra linguaggio e mondo, si riconoscono nel logos di Eraclito caratteristiche salienti del compromesso tra oralità e scrittura.Der Erwerb des Buches ist ,möglich: www.olms.de"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910484708003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Kleinke Kristian"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Applied Multiple Imputation : Advantages, Pitfalls, New Developments and Applications in R / / by Kristian Kleinke, Jost Reinecke, Daniel Salfrán, Martin Spiess"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2020"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-030-38164-1"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 2020.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (XI, 292 p. 20 illus., 3 illus. in color.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences, , 2199-7365"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"001.422"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Social sciences - Statistical methods"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Psychology - Methodology"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Biometry"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Statistics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Mathematical statistics - Data processing"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Statistics in Social Sciences, Humanities, Law, Education, Behavorial Sciences, Public Policy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Psychological Methods"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Biostatistics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Statistical Theory and Methods"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Statistics and Computing"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"1 Introduction and Basic Concepts -- 2 Missing Data Mechanism and Ignorability -- 3 Missing Data Methods -- 4 Multiple Imputation: Theory -- 5 Multiple Imputation: Application -- 6 Multiple Imputation: New Developments -- A Appendices -- Index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book explores missing data techniques and provides a detailed and easy-to-read introduction to multiple imputation, covering the theoretical aspects of the topic and offering hands-on help with the implementation. It discusses the pros and cons of various techniques and concepts, including multiple imputation quality diagnostics, an important topic for practitioners. It also presents current research and new, practically relevant developments in the field, and demonstrates the use of recent multiple imputation techniques designed for situations where distributional assumptions of the classical multiple imputation solutions are violated. In addition, the book features "]
[{"$nulls":4},"numerous practical tutorials for widely used R software packages to generate multiple imputations (norm, pan and mice). The provided R code and data sets allow readers to reproduce all the examples and enhance their understanding of the procedures. This book is intended for social and health scientists and other quantitative researchers who analyze incompletely observed data sets, as well as master’s and PhD students with a sound basic knowledge of statistics. ."]