{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":24,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":24,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[17,2,17,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910557460103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Knebel Sven K"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Scientia media : der Molinismus und das Faktenwissen. mit einer Edition des Ms. BU Salamanca 156 von 1653"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Amsterdam/Philadelphia, : John Benjamins, 2021"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2021"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"9789027260079"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (462 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Bochumer Studien Zur Philosophie ; vol. 60"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"211"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"God - Omniscience"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Free will and determinism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Molinism"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Contingency (Philosophy)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Tedesco"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Intro -- SCIENTIA MEDIA -- Editorial page -- Title page -- Copyright page -- Inhalt -- Einführung -- Die nächste Etappe im Historikerstreit über die Gnadenstreitigkeiten -- Die Systematisierung der Scientia Media im XVII. Jahrhundert --  1. [Definition] --  2. [Problem] --  3. [Voraussetzungen] --  4. [These] --  5. [Mögliche Welten] --  6. [Erkenntnisgrund] --  7. [Veritas obiectiva] --  8. [Ontologie] --  9. [Kondizionalität] --  10. [Logik] --  11. [Praxis] --  12. [Situation] --  13. [Indeterminismus] --  14. [Zureichender Grund] --  15. [Impedibilität] --  16. [Existenzialismus] --  17. [Umfang] --  18. [Atomismus] --  19. [Terminus] --  20. [Trägerbezogen] --  21. [Gegenstandsbezogen] --  22. [Scientia Media reflexa] --  23. [Zweck] --  24. [Einsatzschwerpunkte] --  25. [Tragweite] --  26. [Popularisierung] --  27. [Historisierung] --  28. [Peripherie] -- Konklusion -- Anhang zu  6-8 -- Luke Wadding SJ. (1593-1651/52) und sein Traktat über Gottes Wissen vom kontingent Zukünftigen -- Das Dokument -- Ein Ire in Kastilien -- Datierung des Manuskripts -- Dogmatischer Standpunkt -- Suarezismus -- Extrinsische Prädetermination -- Impedibilität -- Auch ein Beitrag zur Scientia Media-Hypothese -- Idealismus -- Diskursarchäologie -- Ein Unfall in der Gutenberggalaxie -- Zur Edition -- Dossier: Luke Wadding, SJ: By Edmund Hogan SJ. (1831-1917) -- Luke Wadding SJ.: Tractatus de scientia Dei futurorum contingentium -- P. Richardus Lynceus, Sacrae "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Theologiae Doctor, et Magister Salmanticensis, ad Lectorem -- Liber quartus: De scientia futurorum contingentium secundum rationem communem ad absolutam et conditionatam, eiusque concordia cum creata libertate, ubi etiam in particulari agitur de scientia absolutorum -- Caput 1. An futura contingentia praesciantur a Deo in causis."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Caput 2. Secunda sententia proponitur et probatur esse Sancti Thomae -- Caput 3. Obiectiones contra mentem S. Thomae -- Caput 4.  Futura contingentia in solis causis omnino antecedentibus non posse a Deo determinate cognosci -- Caput 5.  An, et quo sensu, futura contingentia cognoscantur a Deo in ideis et in divina essentia -- Caput 6.  An, et quo sensu, futura contingentia cognoscuntur a Deo „in se ipsis\" -- Caput 7.  Probatur contingentium futurorum cognoscibilitas in se ipsis, ut obiecto terminativo, concurrente divina essentia ut obiecto motivo, sine ullo praedeterminante decreto -- Caput 8.  Quomodo motivum indifferens ad esse et non-esse futuri obiecti possit esse motivum sufficiens ad cognoscendum determinate, illud esse futurum -- Caput 9. De prioritate obiecti libere futuri ad divinam eius praescientiam -- Caput 10.  Principium, cui innititur prioritas obiecti creati liberi ad divinam praescientiam -- Caput 11.  Ex superiori principio deducitur et probatur actus liberi creati prioritas et determinatio obiectiva respectu divinae praescientiae -- Caput 12.  Explicatur nonnullis obiectionibus praecedentis capitis doctrina [825v] -- Caput 13.  An prioritas obiectivae determinationis exerceatur ab obiecto creato [828v] libero respectu divinae praescientiae ab aeterno vel in tempore? -- Caput 14.  Solutio obiectorum capite 9°, et compendium [834r] doctrinae eiusdem capitis et quinque sequentium -- Caput 15.  Determinata cognoscibilitas futuri sine decreto illud praedeterminante explicatur -- Caput 16.  Explicatur futuritio contingentium et veritas huius causalis „Ideo scit Deus liberum actum nostrum esse futurum, quia futurus est\" -- Caput 17.  Obiectio nova contra doctrinam capitum praecedentium -- Caput 18.  An Deus cognoscat futura contingentia ut futura sibi, vel aliis?."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Caput 19.  [852r] Quae sit futurorum contingentium in aeternitate praesentia, et quid conferat ad divinam illorum cognitionem -- Caput 20.  Iudicium fertur de aliorum sententiis circa futurorum praesentiam in aeternitate -- Caput 21.  Explicatur, quomodo divina scientia futurorum contingentium non sit actus Deo formaliter liber, si ad illam non praecedit decretum praedeterminativum -- Caput 22.  Explicatur, quomodo praedeterminatio obiectiva obstet formali libertati scientiae de futuro contingenti, quamvis illam non praecedat natura -- Caput 23.  An ad hoc, quod scientia futurorum contingentium non sit formaliter libera, opus sit, illam non esse formaliter volitionem? -- Caput 24.  Concordia certitudinis divinae praescientiae futurorum contingentium cum creata libertate -- Caput 25.  Praecedentem rationem probandi concordiam certitudinis praescientiae cum libertate obiecti familiarem esse Patribus et Theologis -- Caput 26.  Eandem concordiae rationem probarunt antiqui Scholastici -- Caput 27.  Aliae probationes concordiae praescientiae cum libertate ex Patribus et Scholasticis proferuntur -- Caput 28.  De scientia absoluta futurorum contingentium eiusque formali obiecto -- Caput 29.  [892v] An scientia absoluta futurorum cognoscat divinum decretum ad futura necessarium, ut existens prius ratione, aut etiam natura, quam ipsa scientia? -- Caput 30. Tres aliae quaestiones solvuntur -- Caput 31.  De obiecto determinativo divinae scientiae absolutae futurorum contingentium -- Tres aliae conclusiones -- Tres aliae conclusiones -- Caput 32.  An futura contingentia absoluta cognoscat Deus in se ipsis, vel in divinis praedefinitionibus et permissionibus? -- Caput 33. De scientiae absolutae futurorum contingentium libertate -- Caput 34.  De "]
[{"$nulls":4},"concordia praescientiae absolutae cum libertate obiecti liberi, quod praescit esse futurum."]
[{"$nulls":4},"Ad quatuor libros praecedentes Appendix de divina voluntate praedefiniente actum liberum disiunctive ut efficiendum per aliquod medium indifferens -- [Obiectio] -- [Responsio] -- Index scholasticus: (unter Angabe der Paragraphen) -- Index nominum*."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Molinism, formerly an invective, is nowadays a topic of philosophy. This book, however, does not deal with the modern renaissance of Middle Knowledge, rather, it explores its proliferation during the 17th and 18th centuries. The focus shifts from reviewing current trends in Church History to rehearsing the metaphysics that backed up Middle Knowledge. Fact, in Molinism, is threefold: It could have been otherwise, it belongs to some possible world, it is necessarily known by the Omniscient. Whereas the classical account of God's foreknowledge rests on its being postvolitional, the Molinist qualification of this account denies that it applies to the counterfactuals. On what else then does it prevolitionally depend that God knows for sure something to happen rather than not to happen? The Salmantine Treatise on God's foreknowledge edited here provides some additional piece of evidence of a deep Molinist disagreement. Though the manuscript was ready for print in 1653, this business failed and the manuscript fell into oblivion along with its author. The Jesuit Luke Wadding (1593-1651) belongs to a number of men from Waterford who at a time, when intolerance forced Catholics into large scale emigration, hopefully turned towards Spain. He must not be confounded with his famous namesake, the Franciscan friar, who was his cousin\"--"]