{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":42,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":42,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[19,4,19,5],[20,2,20,3],[22,2,22,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[34,2,34,3],[35,2,35,3],[39,2,39,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910554597803321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Haas Bruno"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Le beau et ses traductions : Les quatre définitions du beau dans le Hippias majeur de Platon / / Bruno Haas"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Paris, : Éditions de la Sorbonne, 2021"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"979-1-03-510730-7"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (102 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"La philosophie à l’œuvre"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Language &amp; Linguistics"]
[{"$nulls":4},"esthétique"]
[{"$nulls":4},"beau"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Platon"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Socrate"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Hippias majeur"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Francese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Le terme prépon (πρέπον) ne signifie pas seulement le convenable, mais encore la brillance - Homère l’emploie, par exemple, pour dire d’Hector qu’il « brillait » parmi les guerriers troyens (« o d’éprepe kai dia pantôn », Iliade, XII, 104). Prépein (Πρέπειν) se dit ici d’un héros qui parmi ses semblables se distingue, sans doute parce qu’il convient plus qu’eux à la fonction guerrière, mais surtout parce qu’il est plus éclatant. C’est la nuance métaphorique qu’il faut saisir ici. Leconte de l’Isle traduit : « Il les surpassait tous. » Mais la prééminence d’Hector n’est pas une question de taille : Hector est plus considérable que les autres, il est splendide. Selon la première définition de Socrate, le beau serait donc l’éclat d’une splendeur exubérante ; et cette traduction, voire cette interprétation, change le sens du Hippias majeur du tout au tout. La convenance concerne la bonne proportion, l’harmonie, comme Chauvet et Saisset le soulignent, en bons classicistes français du xixe siècle. Cette définition de la beauté peut éventuellement avoir un sens dans le contexte de l’art français du xviie siècle et de son académie où l’on apprenait les canons de proportion simplifiés des Italiens du xvie siècle, mais elle n’a aucun rapport avec les discussions de l’académie platonicienne."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910781451003321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Bates David"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"States of War : Enlightenment Origins of the Political / / David Bates"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, NY : , : Columbia University Press, , [2011]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2011"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-281-60692-8"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786613787637"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-231-52866-3"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (281 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Columbia Studies in Political Thought / Political History"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"MD 4400"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"320.109033"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Enlightenment"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Natural law - History - 18th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Sovereignty - History - 18th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"State, The - History - 18th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"War (International law) - History - 18th century"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Contents -- Foreword / Howard, Dick -- Preface -- Introduction. Constitutional Violence and Enlightenment Thought -- Chapter 1. The Autonomous State and the Origin of the Political -- Chapter 2. States of Reasoning: Modern Natural-Law Theory -- Chapter 3. Locke's Natural History of the Political -- Chapter 4. Systems of Sovereignty in Montesquieu -- Chapter 5. Rousseau's Cybernetic Political Body -- Conclusion. From the Concept of the Political to the Rule of Law -- Notes -- Index"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","We fear that the growing threat of violent attack has upset the balance between existential concepts of political power, which emphasize security, and traditional notions of constitutional limits meant to protect civil liberties. We worry that constitutional states cannot, during a time of war, terror, and extreme crisis, maintain legality and preserve civil rights and freedoms. David Williams Bates allays these concerns by revisiting the theoretical origins of the modern constitutional state, which, he argues, recognized and made room for tensions among law, war, and the social order.We traditionally associate the Enlightenment with the taming of absolutist sovereign power through the establishment of a legal state based on the rights of individuals. In his "]
[{"$nulls":4},"critical rereading, Bates shows instead that Enlightenment thinkers conceived of political autonomy in a systematic, theoretical way. Focusing on the nature of foundational violence, war, and existential crises, eighteenth-century thinkers understood law and constitutional order not as constraints on political power but as the logical implication of that primordial force. Returning to the origin stories that informed the beginnings of political community, Bates reclaims the idea of law, warfare, and the social order as intertwining elements subject to complex historical development. Following an analysis of seminal works by seventeenth-century natural-law theorists, Bates reviews the major canonical thinkers of constitutional theory (Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau) from the perspective of existential security and sovereign power. Countering Carl Schmitt's influential notion of the autonomy of the political, Bates demonstrates that Enlightenment thinkers understood the autonomous political sphere as a space of law protecting individuals according to their political status, not as mere members of a historically contingent social order."]