{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":33,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":33,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[16,2,16,3],[16,4,16,5],[17,2,17,3],[17,4,17,5],[18,2,18,3],[18,4,18,5],[19,2,19,3],[21,2,21,3],[22,2,22,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[30,2,30,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNISA996390631703316"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"By the Lord Deputie and Councell [[electronic resource] ] : whereas for preuention of such disorders, ryots and rebellions within this realme, as might grow by loose and disloyall people ."]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Imprinted at Dublin, : By the Company of Stationers, Printers to the Kings most excellent Maiestie, Anno Domini 1625"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 sheet ([1] p.)"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Arms control - Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Gun control - Ireland"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Broadsides17th century.London (England)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Ireland History 1625-1649"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Great Britain History Charles I, 1625-1649"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","At head of text: Henry Falkland."]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"Giuen at his Maiesties Castle of Dublin the 25. of Iune, 1625. Adam Loftus Canc. Lanc. Dublin. Charl. Wilmot. Dom. Kinsale. Henry Docwra. Francis Aungier. George Shurley. Adam Loftus.\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"Reproduction of original in: Society of Antiquaries."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","eebo-0147"]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910554245103321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"He Xin"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Divorce in China : institutional constraints and gendered outcomes / / Xin He"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, New York State : , : New York University Press, , [2021]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Â©2021"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4798-0554-8"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (305 pages) : illustrations"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"346.510166"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Divorce - China"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Divorce - Law and legislation - China"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Frontmatter -- Contents -- Preface: Gender Bias in Chinese Courts -- 1. Institutional Constraints -- 2. Routinized Approaches -- 3. The Pragmatic Judge -- 4. Trivializing Domestic Violence -- 5. Sacrificing Women's Rights to Child Custody -- 6. Property Division and Male Advantage -- 7. Cultural Biases -- Epilogue: Gendered Divorces in Chinese Courts -- Acknowledgments -- Appendix 1: Fieldwork Photographs -- Appendix 2: Fieldwork Cases and Adjudication -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index -- About the Author"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","Why are women still at a disadvantage in Chinese divorce courts?Despite the increase of gender consciousness in Chinese society and a trove of legislation to protect women, why are Chinese women still disadvantaged in divorce courts? Xin He argues that institutional constraints to which judges are subject, a factor largely ignored by existing literature, play a crucial role. Twisting the divorce law practices are the bureaucratic incentives of courts and their political concerns for social stability. Because of these concerns, judges often choose the most efficient, and safest, way to handle issues in divorce cases. In so doing, they allow the forces of inequality in social, economic, cultural, and political areas to infiltrate their decisions. Divorce requests are delayed; domestic violence is trivialized; and women's child custody is sacrificed. The institutional failure to enforce the laws has become a major obstacle to gender justice.Divorce in China is the only study of Chinese divorce cases based on fieldwork and interviews conducted inside Chinese courtrooms over the course of a decade. With an "]
[{"$nulls":4},"unusual vantage point, Xin He offers a rare and unfiltered view of the operation of Chinese courts in the authoritarian regime. Through a socio-legal perspective highlighting the richness, sophistication, and cutting-edge nature of the research, Divorce in China is as much an account of Chinese courts in action as a social ethnography of China in the midst of momentous social change."]