{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":17,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":17,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[8,2,8,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910524887703321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Olivas Michael A"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Suing Alma Mater : Higher Education and the Courts / / Michael A. Olivas"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Baltimore : , : Johns Hopkins University Press, , 2013"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2013"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-4214-0924-0"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (xiii, 221 p. )"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"344.73/074"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"College students - Legal status, laws, etc - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"College teachers - Legal status, laws, etc - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Universities and colleges - Law and legislation - United States"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"A primer on higher education law in the United States -- A brief history of higher education litigation in the United States Supreme Court -- Making it to the Supreme Court and the rise of purposive organizations -- The traditional model of higher education in the litigation spotlight: United States v. Fordice -- Hopwood v. Texas: \"a university may properly favor one applicant over another because of his ability to play the cello, make a downfield tackle, or understand chaos theory\" -- Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine: Jews need not apply -- Axson-Flynn v. Johnson: \"talk to some other mormon girls who are good mormons, who don't have a problem with this\" -- Location, location, location: Richards v. League of United Latin American citizens and the cartography of colleges -- Clark v. Claremont University Center: \"I mean, us white people have rights, too\" -- The developing law of faculty discontent: the Garcetti effect."]