{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":29,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":29,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[9,2,9,3],[9,4,9,5],[10,2,10,3],[10,4,10,5],[11,2,11,3],[11,4,11,5],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[14,2,14,3],[15,2,15,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[19,2,19,3],[23,2,23,3],[24,2,24,3],[26,2,26,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910481168203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Anon"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Quod homo sit paruus mundus disputatio tribus capitibus conprehensa proposita ab Antonio Vendrameno . [[electronic resource]]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Pat., : [s.n.], 1601"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"Online resource ([12], 29, [3] p., 4°)"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Latino"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Reproduction of original in Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910315359203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Leardi Stefano"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Contextualism, Factivity and Closure : A Union That Should Not Take Place? / / by Stefano Leardi, Nicla Vassallo"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Cham : , : Springer International Publishing : , : Imprint : Springer, , 2018"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"3-030-16155-2"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[1st ed. 2018.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (101 pages)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"SpringerBriefs in Philosophy, , 2211-4548"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"121"]
[{"$nulls":4},"120"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Knowledge, Theory of"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Logic, Symbolic and mathematical"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Epistemology"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Mathematical Logic and Foundations"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"1. Introduction -- 2. Is Epistemic Contextualism an Inconsistent Theory? -- 3. Solving the Factivity Problem -- 4. Two Promising Approaches -- 5. Conclusions. ."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book analyses an inconsistency within epistemic contextualism known as the factivity problem. It also provides key insights into epistemic contextualism, an important innovation in contemporary epistemology, enabling readers to gain a better understanding of the various solutions to the factivity problem. As the authors demonstrate, each explanation is based on a different interpretation of the problem. Divided into seven chapters, the book offers comprehensive coverage of this topic, which will be of major interest to philosophers engaged in epistemology and the philosophy of language. After an introductory chapter, Chapter 2 presents the most common understanding of epistemic contextualism and its semantic basis. It also clarifies the epistemological implications of the theory’s semantic assumptions. This chapter also explains the main argument of the factivity problem. The next four chapters discuss the respective solutions proposed by Wolfgang Freitag, Alexander Dinges, Anthony Brueckner and Christopher Buford, Michael Ashfield, Martin Montminy and Wes Skolits, and Peter Baumann. Stefano Leardi and Nicla Vassallo highlight the similarities and commonalities, identifying three main approaches to "]
[{"$nulls":4},"the factivity problem. Chapter 7 provides a brief overview of the solutions proposed to solve the factivity problem and presents an outline of the conclusions reached in the book."]