{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":1,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":22,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":22,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[15,2,15,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910466900603321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Triple bottom line evaluation of biosolids management options / / by Mike Elenbaas [and five others]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Alexandria, Virginia : , : Water Environment Research Foundation, , 2014"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2014"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-78040-717-3"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (132 p.)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"628.364"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Sewage sludge - Environmental aspects"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Sewage - Purification"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"\"\"Cover\"\"; \"\"Copyright\"\"; \"\"Acknowledgments\"\"; \"\"Abstract and Benefits\"\"; \"\"Table of Contents\"\"; \"\"List of Tables\"\"; \"\"List of Figures\"\"; \"\"List of Acronyms\"\"; \"\"Executive Summary\"\"; \"\"Chapter 1.0: Introduction\"\"; \"\"1.1 Assessing Biosolids Management Options\"\"; \"\"1.2 Background\"\"; \"\"1.3 What is a Triple Bottom Line Approach?\"\"; \"\"Chapter 2.0: Triple Bottom Line Evaluation\"\"; \"\"2.1 Background: WERF TBL Tool for Assessing Biosolids Options\"\"; \"\"2.2 General Considerations\"\"; \"\"2.2.1 Defining the Scope of the TBL Analysis\"\"; \"\"2.2.2 Selecting TBL Criteria and Sub-Criteria\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"2.3 Economic Criteria for This TBL Analysis\"\"\"\"2.3.1 Lifecycle Economic Assessment\"\"; \"\"2.3.2 Engineering/Technical Criteria\"\"; \"\"2.3.3 Additional Considerations\"\"; \"\"2.4 Environmental Criteria for This TBL Analysis\"\"; \"\"2.4.1 Use of LCA Within the Environmental Criteria\"\"; \"\"2.4.2 Examples of Environmental Criteria Considered, But Not Included\"\"; \"\"2.5 Social Criteria for the TBL Analysis\"\"; \"\"2.5.1 Nuisance Issues\"\"; \"\"2.5.2 Workplace Conditions\"\"; \"\"2.5.3 Public Engagement\"\"; \"\"2.5.4 Social Criteria Focus on Inherent Qualities of a Biosolids Management Option\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"2.5.5 Examples of Social Criteria Considered, But Not Included\"\"\"\"2.6 The Criteria: Metrics, Weighting, Normalizing, and Sensitivity Analysis\"\"; \"\"2.6.1 Choosing Metrics for Criteria\"\"; \"\"2.6.2 Weighting the Criteria\"\"; \"\"2.6.3 Normalizing Scores for Comparison\"\"; \"\"2.6.4 Sensitivity Analysis\"\"; \"\"Chapter 3.0: Overview of Six Scenarios Selected for Triple "]
[{"$nulls":4},"Bottom Line Analysis\"\"; \"\"3.1 1X/1Y - Anaerobic Digestion, CHP with Pretreatment\"\"; \"\"3.2 2X/2Y - Anaerobic Digestion, CHP with Codigestion\"\"; \"\"3.3 3Y - Incineration with Landfill Disposal\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"3.4 4Y - Gasification with Landfill Disposal\"\"\"\"Chapter 4.0: Discussion of Scoring\"\"; \"\"4.1 Economic Scoring\"\"; \"\"4.2 Environmental Scoring\"\"; \"\"4.3 Social Scoring\"\"; \"\"4.3.1 Public Engagement\"\"; \"\"4.4 Stakeholder Involvement in Criteria Weightings\"\"; \"\"Chapter 5.0: Triple Bottom Line Results for Research Guidance\"\"; \"\"5.1 Economic Results\"\"; \"\"5.2 Environmental Results\"\"; \"\"5.2.1 Results for Conservation/Optimization of Resources\"\"; \"\"5.2.2 Results for Net Impacts to Media\"\"; \"\"5.2.3 Results for Regulatory Flexibility\"\"; \"\"5.3 Social Results\"\"; \"\"5.3.1 Results for Nuisance Issues\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"5.3.2 Results for Workplace Conditions\"\"\"\"5.3.3 Results for Public Engagement\"\"; \"\"5.4 Research Guidance Case Results\"\"; \"\"Chapter 6.0: Triple Bottom Line Results for Utility Decision Making\"\"; \"\"6.1 Utility Decision Making\"\"; \"\"6.2 Sensitivity Analysis and Discussion\"\"; \"\"6.2.1 Assumptions Used for Sensitivities\"\"; \"\"6.2.2 Low Electric and Gas Cost Sensitivity\"\"; \"\"6.2.3 High Electric and Gas Cost Sensitivity\"\"; \"\"6.2.4 Carbon Cap Sensitivity\"\"; \"\"6.2.5 Applying Different Criteria Weights Sensitivity\"\"; \"\"Chapter 7.0: Conclusions and Findings\"\"; \"\"7.1 Research Guidance TBL Model Findings\"\""]
[{"$nulls":4},"\"\"7.2 Utility Decision-Making Results Findings\"\""]