{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":39,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":39,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[4,2,4,3],[5,2,5,3],[6,2,6,3],[7,2,7,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[17,2,17,3],[20,2,20,3],[20,4,20,5],[21,2,21,3],[21,4,21,5],[22,2,22,3],[22,4,22,5],[23,2,23,3],[25,2,25,3],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[28,2,28,3],[29,2,29,3],[32,2,32,3],[33,2,33,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910466551503321"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Blurring boundaries : human security and forced migration / / edited by Stefan Salomon [and three others]"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Leiden : , : Brill Nijhoff, , [2017]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2017"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"90-04-32687-1"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (232 pages)"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"320.12"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Forced migration"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Refugees"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Human smuggling"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Human trafficking"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Includes index."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Preliminary Material / Stefan Salomon , Lisa Heschl , Gerd Oberleitner and Wolfgang Benedek -- Whose Security? Introductory Remarks on People on the Move and the Reclaiming of Security / Gerd Oberleitner and Stefan Salomon -- Global Responsibility Sharing and the Production of Superfluity in the Context of Refugee Protection / Dana Schmalz -- The Exceptional Case of Refugees in Lebanon: An Argument for Rethinking the Concept of State Authority / Maximilian Lakitsch -- The Missing Link between Law on Force and Refugee Law: Some Preliminary Remarks in Context / Stefan Salomon -- Human Security and Shared Responsibility to Fight Transnational Crimes: Resolution 2240 (2015) of the UN Security Council on Smuggling of Migrants and Human Trafficking off the Coast of Libya / Vassilis P. Tzevelekos -- The 2015 Andaman Sea Boat ‘Crisis’: Human Rights and Refugee Law Considerations / Bríd Ní Ghráinne -- Just Relocation? Planned Relocation from Climate Change, Human Rights and Justice / Daniel Petz -- The EU’s Strategy to Tackle Environmentally Induced Migration while Protecting Human Security / Susanna Villani -- Trafficking in Human Beings and Human Security: A Comprehensive Approach / Marco Borraccetti -- Index / Stefan Salomon , Lisa Heschl , Gerd Oberleitner and Wolfgang Benedek."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In Blurring Boundaries: Human Security and Forced Migration scholars "]
[{"$nulls":4},"from law and social sciences offer a fresh view on the major issues of forced migration through the lens of human security. Although much scholarship engages with forced migration and human security independently, they have hardly been weaved together in a comprehensive manner. The contributions cover the issues of refugee law, maritime migration, human smuggling and trafficking and environmental migration. Blurring Boundaries critically engages boundaries produced in the law with the main ideas of human security, thus providing a much-needed novel vocabulary for a critical discourse in forced migration studies."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910460994603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Buehl Jonathan"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Assembling arguments : multimodal rhetoric and scientific discourse / / Jonathan Buehl"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Columbia : , : University of South Carolina Press, , [2016]"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2016"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-61117-562-3"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (302 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Studies in rhetoric/communication"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"501/.4"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Communication in science - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Rhetoric - Philosophy"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","\"Scientific arguments--and indeed arguments in most disciplines--depend on visuals and other nontextual elements; however, most models of argumentation typically neglect these important resources. In Assembling Arguments, Jonathan Buehl offers a concentrated study of scientific argumentation that is sensitive to both the historical and theoretical possibilities of multimodal persuasion as it advances two related claims. First, rhetorical theory--when augmented with methods for reading nonverbal representations--can provide the analytical tools needed to understand and appreciate multimodal scientific arguments. Second, science--an inherently multimodal enterprise--offers ideal subjects for developing general theories of multimodal rhetoric applicable across fields. In developing these claims, Buehl offers a comprehensive account of scientific persuasion as a multimodal process and develops a simple but productive framework for analyzing and teaching multimodal argumentation. Comprising five case studies, the book provides detailed treatments of argumentation in specific technological and historical contexts: argumentation before World War I, when images circulated by hand and by post; argumentation during the mid-twentieth century, when computers were beginning to bolster scientific inquiry but images remained hand-crafted products; and argumentation at the turn of the twenty-first century--an era of digital revolutions and digital fraud. Each study examines the rhetorical "]
[{"$nulls":4},"problems and strategies of specific scientists to investigate key issues regarding visualization and argument: 1) establishing new instruments as reliable sources of visual evidence; 2) creating novel arguments from reliable visual evidence; 3) creating novel arguments with unreliable visual evidence; 4) preserving the credibility of visualization practices; and 5) creating multimodal artifacts before and in the era of digital circulation. Given the growing enterprise of rhetorical studies and the field's contributions to communication practices in all disciplines, rhetoricians need a comprehensive rhetoric of science--one that accounts for the multimodal arguments that change our relation to reality. Assembling Arguments argues that such rhetoric should enable the interpretation of visual scientific arguments and improve science-writing instruction\"--"]