{"text_format":"2","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":1,"sheets":["report2"],"not_rendered":{"charts":0,"images":0,"macros":0,"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":0,"pivot_tables":0},"unopened":[],"bounds":{"document_bytes":16777216,"sheet_cells":100000,"run_cost":"one","rows_first":2000,"rows_last":500,"rows_between":2000,"halvings":0,"cell_chars":16384,"cell_head_chars":4096},"cells_cut":0,"cells_raw":0,"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"report2","index":0,"n_rows":46,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":46,"cut":false,"hidden":false,"merged":[[0,2,0,3],[0,4,0,5],[1,2,1,3],[1,4,1,5],[2,2,2,3],[2,4,2,5],[3,2,3,3],[5,2,5,3],[9,2,9,3],[10,2,10,3],[11,2,11,3],[12,2,12,3],[13,2,13,3],[16,2,16,3],[17,2,17,3],[21,2,21,3],[23,2,23,3],[23,4,23,5],[24,2,24,3],[24,4,24,5],[25,2,25,3],[25,4,25,5],[26,2,26,3],[27,2,27,3],[30,2,30,3],[31,2,31,3],[32,2,32,3],[33,2,33,3],[34,2,34,3],[35,2,35,3],[38,2,38,3],[39,2,39,3],[43,2,43,3]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
[null,"1.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910465788603321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Goh Irving"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"The reject : community, politics, and religion after the subject / / Irving Goh"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"New York, New York : , : Fordham University Press, , 2015"]
[{"$nulls":4},"©2015"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"0-8232-6269-3"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-8232-6637-0"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-8232-6271-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"0-8232-6272-3"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[First edition.]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (381 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Commonalities"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"126"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Rejection (Psychology)"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Outcasts"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Electronic books."]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Front matter -- Contents -- Preface: A Book For Everyone -- Acknowledgments -- 1. Introduction -- 2. (After) Friendship, Love, and Community -- 3. The Reject And The “Postsecular,” or Who’s Afraid of Religion -- 4. Prolegomenon to Reject Politics -- 5. Clinamen, or the Auto-Reject for “Posthuman” Futures. -- 6. Conclusion -- Notes -- Works Cited -- Index -- Commonalities"]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","This book proposes a theory of the reject, a more adequate figure than the subject for thinking friendship, love, community, democracy, the postsecular, and the posthuman. Through close readings of Nancy, Deleuze, Derrida, Cixous, Clement, Bataille, Balibar, Ranciere, and Badiou, Goh shows how the reject has always been nascent in contemporary French thought. The recent turn to animals and bare life, as well as the rise of the Occupy movement, he argues, presents a special urgency to think the reject today. Thinking the reject most importantly helps to advance our commitment to affirm others without acculturating their differences. But the reject also offers, Goh proposes, a response finally commensurate with the radical horizon of Nancy’s question of who comes after the subject."]
[null,"2.","Record Nr.",null,"UNINA9910778216203321"]
[null,null,"Autore",null,"Moore Kelly <1962->"]
[null,null,"Titolo",null,"Disrupting science [[electronic resource] ] : social movements, American scientists, and the politics of the military, 1945-1975 / / Kelly Moore"]
[null,null,"Pubbl/distr/stampa",null,"Princeton, N.J., : Princeton University Press, c2008"]
[null,null,"ISBN",null,"1-282-15894-5"]
[{"$nulls":4},"9786612158940"]
[{"$nulls":4},"1-4008-2380-3"]
[null,null,"Edizione",null,"[Course Book]"]
[null,null,"Descrizione fisica",null,"1 online resource (325 p.)"]
[null,null,"Collana",null,"Princeton studies in cultural sociology"]
[null,null,"Classificazione",null,"MS 1120"]
[null,null,"Disciplina",null,"509.73"]
[null,null,"Soggetti",null,"Science - Social aspects - United States - History - 20th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Science - Political aspects - United States - History - 20th century"]
[{"$nulls":4},"Scientists - United States - Political activity - History - 20th century"]
[null,null,"Lingua di pubblicazione",null,"Inglese"]
[null,null,"Formato",null,"Materiale a stampa"]
[null,null,null,"Livello bibliografico","Monografia"]
[null,null,null,"Note generali","Description based upon print version of record."]
[null,null,null,"Nota di bibliografia","Includes bibliographical references (p. [269]-291) and index."]
[null,null,"Nota di contenuto",null,"Introduction -- The expansion and critiques of science-military ties, 1945-1970 -- Scientists as moral individuals : Quakerism and the Society for Social Responsibility in Science -- Information and political neutrality : liberal science activism and the St. Louis Committee for Nuclear Information -- Confronting liberalism : the anti-Vietnam War movement and the ABM debate, 1965-1969 -- Doing \"Science for the People\" : enactments of a new left politics of science -- Conclusions : disrupting the social and moral order of science."]
[null,null,null,"Sommario/riassunto","In the decades following World War II, American scientists were celebrated for their contributions to social and technological progress. They were also widely criticized for their increasingly close ties to military and governmental power--not only by outside activists but from among the ranks of scientists themselves. Disrupting Science tells the story of how scientists formed new protest organizations that democratized science and made its pursuit more transparent. The book explores how scientists weakened their own authority even as they invented new forms of political action. Drawing extensively from archival sources and in-depth interviews, Kelly Moore examines the features of American science that made it an attractive target for protesters in the early cold war and Vietnam eras, including scientists' work in military research and activities perceived as environmentally harmful. She describes the intellectual traditions that protesters drew "]
[{"$nulls":4},"from--liberalism, moral individualism, and the New Left--and traces the rise and influence of scientist-led protest organizations such as Science for the People and the Union of Concerned Scientists. Moore shows how scientist protest activities disrupted basic assumptions about science and the ways scientific knowledge should be produced, and recast scientists' relationships to political and military institutions. Disrupting Science reveals how the scientific community cumulatively worked to unbind its own scientific authority and change how science and scientists are perceived. In doing so, the book redefines our understanding of social movements and the power of insider-led protest."]